FWMIX vs. VTV
FWMIX (American Funds Washington Mutual F3) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. FWMIX is actively managed, while VTV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FWMIX returned 12.50%/yr vs 12.22%/yr for VTV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FWMIX charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
FWMIX vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FWMIX achieves a 5.62% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 14.47% return.
FWMIX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 5.62%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- 16.73%
- 3Y*
- 18.23%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- —
VTV
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 14.47%
- 6M
- 13.93%
- 1Y
- 27.19%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.95%
FWMIX vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWMIX American Funds Washington Mutual F3 | 5.62% | 17.55% | 19.35% | 17.58% | -8.17% | 28.85% | 8.01% | 25.14% | -5.90% | 19.05% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 14.47% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 16.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between FWMIX and VTV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.92 |
The correlation between FWMIX and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FWMIX vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
FWMIX
VTV
FWMIX vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Washington Mutual F3 (FWMIX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FWMIX | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.47 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 4.30 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.18 | 16.20 | -7.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FWMIX vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWMIX drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWMIX and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWMIX | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.65% | -59.27% | +24.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -6.35% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.63% | -14.52% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.46% | -17.04% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -0.56% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -7.85% | +4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 1.68% | +0.24% |
Volatility
FWMIX vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds Washington Mutual F3 (FWMIX) is 2.89%, while Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that FWMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FWMIX | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 3.41% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.03% | 7.85% | +0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.54% | 10.39% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 13.88% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 16.65% | +0.03% |
FWMIX vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FWMIX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FWMIX vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
FWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.12%, more than VTV's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWMIX American Funds Washington Mutual F3 | 10.12% | 10.38% | 10.37% | 6.43% | 6.64% | 6.34% | 3.35% | 6.40% | 4.67% | 7.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.83% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FWMIX and VTV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTV has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to FWMIX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWMIX dropped -34.65% vs VTV's -59.27%.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FWMIX and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer