PortfoliosLab logo
FWD vs. VGT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FWD and VGT is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FWD vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
54.39%
56.17%
FWD
VGT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FWD:

0.24

VGT:

0.39

Sortino Ratio

FWD:

0.53

VGT:

0.73

Omega Ratio

FWD:

1.07

VGT:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

FWD:

0.25

VGT:

0.43

Martin Ratio

FWD:

0.80

VGT:

1.39

Ulcer Index

FWD:

8.94%

VGT:

8.33%

Daily Std Dev

FWD:

29.90%

VGT:

29.76%

Max Drawdown

FWD:

-29.02%

VGT:

-54.63%

Current Drawdown

FWD:

-13.22%

VGT:

-11.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWD achieves a -4.21% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's -8.02% return.


FWD

YTD

-4.21%

1M

8.70%

6M

-7.12%

1Y

7.01%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

VGT

YTD

-8.02%

1M

7.01%

6M

-8.30%

1Y

11.53%

5Y*

18.78%

10Y*

19.37%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FWD vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.10% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FWD vs. VGT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FWD is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FWD is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FWD is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FWD is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FWD is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FWD is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VGT is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VGT is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VGT is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VGT is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VGT is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VGT is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FWD vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWD and VGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.24
0.39
FWD
VGT

Dividends

FWD vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

FWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than VGT's 0.56% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FWD
AB Disruptors ETF
1.97%1.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.56%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%1.12%

Drawdowns

FWD vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWD drawdown since its inception was -29.02%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWD and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-13.22%
-11.63%
FWD
VGT

Volatility

FWD vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) have volatilities of 9.02% and 9.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.02%
9.35%
FWD
VGT