PortfoliosLab logo
FWD vs. FFLC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FWD and FFLC is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FWD vs. FFLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
54.39%
49.08%
FWD
FFLC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FWD:

0.24

FFLC:

0.35

Sortino Ratio

FWD:

0.53

FFLC:

0.67

Omega Ratio

FWD:

1.07

FFLC:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

FWD:

0.25

FFLC:

0.39

Martin Ratio

FWD:

0.80

FFLC:

1.41

Ulcer Index

FWD:

8.94%

FFLC:

5.40%

Daily Std Dev

FWD:

29.90%

FFLC:

19.84%

Max Drawdown

FWD:

-29.02%

FFLC:

-19.72%

Current Drawdown

FWD:

-13.22%

FFLC:

-8.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWD achieves a -4.21% return, which is significantly lower than FFLC's -3.27% return.


FWD

YTD

-4.21%

1M

8.70%

6M

-7.12%

1Y

7.01%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FFLC

YTD

-3.27%

1M

4.73%

6M

-6.49%

1Y

6.91%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FWD vs. FFLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FFLC's 0.38% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FWD vs. FFLC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FWD is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FWD is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FWD is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FWD is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FWD is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FWD is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FFLC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFLC is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFLC is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFLC is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFLC is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFLC is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFLC is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FWD vs. FFLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the FFLC Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWD and FFLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.24
0.35
FWD
FFLC

Dividends

FWD vs. FFLC - Dividend Comparison

FWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than FFLC's 0.98% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020
FWD
AB Disruptors ETF
1.97%1.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
0.98%0.82%0.57%1.67%1.68%0.89%

Drawdowns

FWD vs. FFLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWD drawdown since its inception was -29.02%, which is greater than FFLC's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWD and FFLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-13.22%
-8.23%
FWD
FFLC

Volatility

FWD vs. FFLC - Volatility Comparison

AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) has a higher volatility of 9.02% compared to Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) at 6.72%. This indicates that FWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.02%
6.72%
FWD
FFLC