FWD vs. POW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FWD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FWD charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

FWD vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWD achieves a 27.74% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.

FWD

• 1D: -3.47%
• 1M: -4.98%
• 6M: 18.54%
• YTD: 27.74%
• 1Y: 49.93%
• 3Y*: 32.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

POW

• 1D: -3.60%
• 1M: -8.76%
• 6M: 31.71%
• YTD: 38.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWD vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	27.74%	-3.48%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	38.93%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FWD and POW is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.83

Return for Risk

FWD vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWD

FWD Risk / Return Rank: 72
FWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FWD Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FWD Martin Ratio Rank: 80

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWD vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FWD	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.85	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.20	—	—

Drawdowns

FWD vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWD drawdown since its inception was -29.02%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWD and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	FWD	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.02%	-18.37%	-10.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.39%	-18.37%	+7.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.09%	-4.33%	+0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.10%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FWD	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.28%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.51%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.18%	32.94%	-4.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.73%	32.94%	-7.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.73%	32.94%	-7.21%

FWD vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FWD vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

FWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	0.09%	0.11%	1.89%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FWD and POW in my portfolio?

FWD and POW have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FWD or POW?

On fees, FWD is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FWD or POW?

FWD is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FWD or POW?

POW has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.09% for FWD.

What is the main difference between FWD and POW?

FWD is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FWD and 0.75% for POW.