FGTIX vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FGTIX (Franklin Growth Allocation Fund) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both funds - FGTIX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, FGTIX returned 10.43%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGTIX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

FGTIX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Growth Allocation Fund (FGTIX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FGTIX having a 9.62% return and VOO slightly higher at 9.75%. Over the past 10 years, FGTIX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.43%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.

FGTIX

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 1.49%
• YTD: 9.62%
• 6M: 9.46%
• 1Y: 23.74%
• 3Y*: 16.69%
• 5Y*: 9.34%
• 10Y*: 10.43%

VOO

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 9.75%
• 6M: 9.30%
• 1Y: 26.77%
• 3Y*: 21.36%
• 5Y*: 13.58%
• 10Y*: 15.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGTIX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGTIX Franklin Growth Allocation Fund	9.62%	17.82%	15.13%	17.62%	-17.12%	16.39%	14.54%	21.85%	-6.45%	18.06%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	9.75%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FGTIX and VOO is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010	0.95

The correlation between FGTIX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGTIX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGTIX

FGTIX Risk / Return Rank: 65
FGTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FGTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FGTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FGTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FGTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 68
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGTIX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Growth Allocation Fund (FGTIX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGTIX	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.17	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	2.93	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.39	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	3.02	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.87	13.58	-0.71

FGTIX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGTIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGTIX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGTIX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGTIX drawdown since its inception was -46.40%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGTIX and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGTIX	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.40%	-33.99%	-12.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.16%	-8.90%	+0.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.22%	-18.69%	+4.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.56%	-24.52%	-7.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.56%	-33.99%	+2.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-1.74%	+1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.14%	-3.68%	-6.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	1.98%	-0.15%

Volatility

FGTIX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Growth Allocation Fund (FGTIX) is 4.35%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that FGTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGTIX	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.35%	4.60%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.05%	9.73%	-0.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.87%	12.39%	-1.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.10%	16.90%	-1.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.91%	18.05%	-4.14%

FGTIX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGTIX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGTIX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FGTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGTIX Franklin Growth Allocation Fund	4.54%	8.98%	2.27%	3.28%	4.93%	14.27%	5.11%	11.14%	9.45%	6.22%	2.70%	6.36%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.04%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGTIX and VOO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, FGTIX and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FGTIX or VOO?

VOO has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to FGTIX (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGTIX dropped -46.40% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.