FVEM.DE vs. IBC3.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FVEM.DE (Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation) and IBC3.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - FVEM.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Paris Aligned while IBC3.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FVEM.DE returned 18.13%/yr vs 20.30%/yr for IBC3.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.

Performance

FVEM.DE vs. IBC3.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FVEM.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FVEM.DE having a 25.43% return and IBC3.DE slightly higher at 25.91%.

FVEM.DE

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 4.58%
• YTD: 25.43%
• 6M: 27.21%
• 1Y: 47.18%
• 3Y*: 18.13%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBC3.DE

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: 25.91%
• 6M: 27.63%
• 1Y: 47.26%
• 3Y*: 20.30%
• 5Y*: 8.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVEM.DE vs. IBC3.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FVEM.DE Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation	25.43%	17.23%	13.32%	0.60%
IBC3.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF	25.91%	17.59%	14.06%	6.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FVEM.DE and IBC3.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2023	0.93

The correlation between FVEM.DE and IBC3.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FVEM.DE vs. IBC3.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVEM.DE

FVEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 83
FVEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FVEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FVEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FVEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FVEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 84

IBC3.DE

IBC3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 83
IBC3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
IBC3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
IBC3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 83
IBC3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
IBC3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVEM.DE vs. IBC3.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FVEM.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FVEM.DE	IBC3.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.66	2.71	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	3.65	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.49	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.42	4.51	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.79	16.28	+0.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FVEM.DE vs. IBC3.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the IBC3.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVEM.DE and IBC3.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FVEM.DE	IBC3.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.66	2.71	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.08	0.47	+0.60

Drawdowns

FVEM.DE vs. IBC3.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, smaller than the maximum IBC3.DE drawdown of -31.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVEM.DE and IBC3.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FVEM.DE	IBC3.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.76%	-31.89%	+13.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.62%	-10.42%	-0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.76%	-19.08%	+0.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.08%	-2.52%	+0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.46%	-7.84%	+4.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.80%	2.89%	-0.09%

Volatility

FVEM.DE vs. IBC3.DE - Volatility Comparison

Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FVEM.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE) have volatilities of 7.26% and 7.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FVEM.DE	IBC3.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.26%	7.06%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.82%	14.60%	+0.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.67%	17.37%	+0.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.04%	16.23%	-0.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.04%	18.42%	-2.38%

FVEM.DE vs. IBC3.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FVEM.DE and IBC3.DE have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FVEM.DE vs. IBC3.DE - Dividend Comparison

FVEM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBC3.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FVEM.DE Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IBC3.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF	1.88%	2.26%	2.44%	2.69%	3.36%	2.18%	2.09%	2.56%	2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FVEM.DE and IBC3.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FVEM.DE and IBC3.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, FVEM.DE or IBC3.DE?

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FVEM.DE or IBC3.DE?

FVEM.DE and IBC3.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

What is the main difference between FVEM.DE and IBC3.DE?

FVEM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Paris Aligned, while IBC3.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares.