PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IBC3.DE vs. LQQ.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

IBC3.DE vs. LQQ.PA

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA).

IBC3.DE and LQQ.PA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBC3.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). It was launched on Mar 5, 2018. LQQ.PA is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100® Leverage (2x) index. It was launched on Jun 27, 2006. Both IBC3.DE and LQQ.PA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IBC3.DE vs. LQQ.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBC3.DE vs. LQQ.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IBC3.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF		4.71%17.59%14.06%7.48%-13.80%7.38%7.44%21.30%-9.19%
LQQ.PA
Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage		-11.12%14.16%57.02%112.33%-59.20%71.22%74.17%83.28%-3.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBC3.DE achieves a 4.71% return, which is significantly higher than LQQ.PA's -11.12% return.

IBC3.DE

1D
-1.33%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
4.71%
6M
7.36%
1Y
24.26%
3Y*
13.93%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
—

LQQ.PA

1D
-0.39%
1M
-5.18%
YTD
-11.12%
6M
-8.94%
1Y
28.86%
3Y*
34.46%
5Y*
16.59%
10Y*
29.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF

Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage

Often compared with IBC3.DE:
IBC3.DE vs. VGEU.DEIBC3.DE vs. VEMT.LIBC3.DE vs. SSHY.LIBC3.DE vs. IQQY.DEIBC3.DE vs. EIMI.LIBC3.DE vs. VUSA.DEIBC3.DE vs. SPEM
Often compared with LQQ.PA:
LQQ.PA vs. QQQ3.LLQQ.PA vs. QLDLQQ.PA vs. PUST.PALQQ.PA vs. QDVE.DELQQ.PA vs. NASL.LLQQ.PA vs. EQQQ.LLQQ.PA vs. SPY

IBC3.DE vs. LQQ.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBC3.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than LQQ.PA's 0.60% expense ratio.

LQQ.PA
Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage
IBC3.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

IBC3.DE vs. LQQ.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IBC3.DE
IBC3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IBC3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBC3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBC3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IBC3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBC3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
LQQ.PA
LQQ.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LQQ.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQQ.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQQ.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
LQQ.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQQ.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBC3.DE vs. LQQ.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IBC3.DELQQ.PADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.34

0.73

+0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.83

1.22

+0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.17

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

3.14

-0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.13

10.06

+0.07

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBC3.DE vs. LQQ.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBC3.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the LQQ.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBC3.DE and LQQ.PA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IBC3.DELQQ.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

0.73

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.41

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.75

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.63

-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between IBC3.DE and LQQ.PA is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IBC3.DE vs. LQQ.PA - Dividend Comparison

IBC3.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, while LQQ.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IBC3.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF		2.26%2.26%2.44%2.69%3.36%2.18%2.09%2.56%2.08%
LQQ.PA
Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IBC3.DE vs. LQQ.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBC3.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.89%, smaller than the maximum LQQ.PA drawdown of -75.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBC3.DE and LQQ.PA.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

IBC3.DELQQ.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.89%

-75.86%

+43.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.62%

-21.88%

+11.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.95%

-61.21%

+39.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-61.21%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.51%

-17.32%

+8.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.97%

-15.84%

+7.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

6.84%

-4.02%

Volatility

IBC3.DE vs. LQQ.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE) is 7.19%, while Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA) has a volatility of 10.13%. This indicates that IBC3.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQQ.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

IBC3.DELQQ.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.19%

10.13%

-2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.80%

23.30%

-10.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.11%

39.03%

-20.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.76%

39.74%

-23.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.26%

38.79%

-20.53%