IBC3.DE vs. VEMT.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L).
IBC3.DE and VEMT.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBC3.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). It was launched on Mar 5, 2018. VEMT.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on Dec 6, 2016. Both IBC3.DE and VEMT.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBC3.DE or VEMT.L.
Key characteristics
| IBC3.DE | VEMT.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.00% | 0.20% |
| 1Y Return | 11.07% | 3.87% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.46% | 0.43% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.85% | 0.37% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.04 | 0.61 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.82% | 6.43% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.89% | -13.64% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.02% | -2.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBC3.DE and VEMT.L is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IBC3.DE vs. VEMT.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IBC3.DE achieves a 9.00% return, which is significantly higher than VEMT.L's 0.20% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBC3.DE vs. VEMT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBC3.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than VEMT.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IBC3.DE vs. VEMT.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IBC3.DE vs. VEMT.L - Dividend Comparison
IBC3.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than VEMT.L's 2.45% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBC3.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF | 2.55% | 2.69% | 3.36% | 2.18% | 2.09% | 2.56% | 2.08% | 0.00% |
VEMT.L Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing | 2.45% | 6.94% | 6.03% | 5.26% | 5.72% | 5.69% | 5.90% | 6.21% |
Drawdowns
IBC3.DE vs. VEMT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBC3.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.89%, which is greater than VEMT.L's maximum drawdown of -13.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBC3.DE and VEMT.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IBC3.DE vs. VEMT.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (IBC3.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) at 2.04%. This indicates that IBC3.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEMT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.