PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVEM.DE vs. EMSM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVEM.DE vs. EMSM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FVEM.DE) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (EMSM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVEM.DE achieves a 25.43% return, which is significantly lower than EMSM.DE's 27.59% return.


FVEM.DE

1D
-1.33%
1M
4.58%
YTD
25.43%
6M
27.21%
1Y
47.18%
3Y*
18.13%
5Y*
10Y*

EMSM.DE

1D
-1.74%
1M
6.15%
YTD
27.59%
6M
29.59%
1Y
49.96%
3Y*
20.54%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*
9.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVEM.DE vs. EMSM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FVEM.DE and EMSM.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2023

0.94

The correlation between FVEM.DE and EMSM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVEM.DE vs. EMSM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVEM.DE
FVEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FVEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FVEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

EMSM.DE
EMSM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EMSM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMSM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMSM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EMSM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMSM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVEM.DE vs. EMSM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FVEM.DE) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (EMSM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVEM.DEEMSM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.50

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.42

4.83

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.79

17.39

-0.59

FVEM.DE vs. EMSM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the EMSM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVEM.DE and EMSM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVEM.DEEMSM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

2.80

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.42

+0.66

Drawdowns

FVEM.DE vs. EMSM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, smaller than the maximum EMSM.DE drawdown of -36.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVEM.DE and EMSM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVEM.DEEMSM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.76%

-36.49%

+17.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.62%

-10.29%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-19.25%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-2.68%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-10.06%

+6.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.86%

-0.06%

Volatility

FVEM.DE vs. EMSM.DE - Volatility Comparison

Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FVEM.DE) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (EMSM.DE) have volatilities of 7.26% and 7.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVEM.DEEMSM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.26%

7.40%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

14.93%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.67%

17.75%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

16.73%

-0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.04%

18.33%

-2.29%

FVEM.DE vs. EMSM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVEM.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EMSM.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVEM.DE vs. EMSM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FVEM.DE nor EMSM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FVEM.DE and EMSM.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FVEM.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FVEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EMSM.DE.

FVEM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Paris Aligned, while EMSM.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FVEM.DE and 0.55% for EMSM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVEM.DE and EMSM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer