PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVEM.DE vs. EL40.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVEM.DE vs. EL40.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FVEM.DE) and Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (EL40.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVEM.DE achieves a 25.43% return, which is significantly lower than EL40.DE's 26.76% return.


FVEM.DE

1D
-1.33%
1M
4.58%
YTD
25.43%
6M
27.21%
1Y
47.18%
3Y*
18.13%
5Y*
10Y*

EL40.DE

1D
-2.26%
1M
7.03%
YTD
26.76%
6M
28.51%
1Y
47.85%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
9.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVEM.DE vs. EL40.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FVEM.DE
Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation
25.43%17.23%13.32%0.60%
EL40.DE
Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
26.76%17.86%13.11%4.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FVEM.DE and EL40.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2023

0.84

The correlation between FVEM.DE and EL40.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVEM.DE vs. EL40.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVEM.DE
FVEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FVEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FVEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

EL40.DE
EL40.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EL40.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EL40.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
EL40.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
EL40.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
EL40.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVEM.DE vs. EL40.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FVEM.DE) and Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (EL40.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVEM.DEEL40.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.43

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.42

2.88

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.79

7.00

+9.80

FVEM.DE vs. EL40.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the EL40.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVEM.DE and EL40.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVEM.DEEL40.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

1.79

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.30

+0.78

Drawdowns

FVEM.DE vs. EL40.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, smaller than the maximum EL40.DE drawdown of -36.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVEM.DE and EL40.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVEM.DEEL40.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.76%

-36.65%

+17.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.62%

-16.53%

+5.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-18.17%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-3.01%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-11.60%

+8.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

6.82%

-4.02%

Volatility

FVEM.DE vs. EL40.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FVEM.DE) is 7.26%, while Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (EL40.DE) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that FVEM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EL40.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVEM.DEEL40.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.26%

8.00%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

15.83%

-1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.67%

26.69%

-9.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

20.75%

-4.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.04%

20.44%

-4.40%

FVEM.DE vs. EL40.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVEM.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EL40.DE's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVEM.DE vs. EL40.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FVEM.DE nor EL40.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EL40.DE
Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.07%0.00%0.02%0.00%
FVEM.DE
Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FVEM.DE and EL40.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FVEM.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FVEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for EL40.DE.

FVEM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Paris Aligned, while EL40.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Deka Investment GmbH. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FVEM.DE and 0.66% for EL40.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVEM.DE and EL40.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer