FV vs. IQM

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FV (First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF) and IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FV is passively managed, while IQM is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FV returned 9.60%/yr vs 20.00%/yr for IQM. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FV charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IQM.

Performance

FV vs. IQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FV achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 34.32% return.

FV

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 1.47%
• YTD: 15.29%
• 6M: 13.53%
• 1Y: 24.72%
• 3Y*: 17.39%
• 5Y*: 9.60%
• 10Y*: 13.39%

IQM

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 34.32%
• 6M: 30.89%
• 1Y: 61.93%
• 3Y*: 35.24%
• 5Y*: 20.00%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FV vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF	15.29%	7.23%	14.73%	11.34%	-3.93%	21.63%	30.34%
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	34.32%	30.76%	31.03%	41.06%	-33.36%	25.18%	76.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FV and IQM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2020	0.79

The correlation between FV and IQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

FV vs. IQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FV	IQM
Energy	34.8%	2.3%
Technology	23.5%	68.4%
Healthcare	20.5%	1.0%
Financial Services	19.8%	-
Industrials	13.9%	17.1%
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	2.9%
Communication Services	6.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	0.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Utilities	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

FV vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FV

FV Risk / Return Rank: 46
FV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
FV Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FV Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FV Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FV Martin Ratio Rank: 46

IQM

IQM Risk / Return Rank: 70
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 62
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FV vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FV	IQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.98	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	2.40	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.33	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	4.23	-2.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.87	13.19	-6.32

FV vs. IQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FV Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the IQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FV and IQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FV vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FV drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, smaller than the maximum IQM drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FV and IQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FV	IQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.04%	-44.91%	+10.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.45%	-14.71%	+1.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.08%	-30.42%	+7.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.08%	-44.91%	+21.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.48%	-6.78%	+4.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.81%	-12.18%	+6.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	4.71%	-1.10%

Volatility

FV vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) is 6.63%, while Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a volatility of 15.35%. This indicates that FV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FV	IQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.63%	15.35%	-8.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.62%	26.01%	-12.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.16%	31.46%	-15.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.91%	29.56%	-8.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.47%	31.09%	-9.62%

FV vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FV has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FV vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison

FV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, while IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF	0.53%	0.63%	0.14%	0.47%	1.38%	0.11%	0.06%	0.56%	0.19%	0.67%	0.95%	0.14%
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FV and IQM in my portfolio?

FV and IQM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FV or IQM?

IQM has higher volatility (15.35%) compared to FV (6.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FV dropped -34.04% vs IQM's -44.91%.

Which ETF is better, FV or IQM?

On 5-year performance, IQM leads with 20.00% vs 9.60% for FV. On fees, IQM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FV has been the lower-risk option at 6.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FV or IQM?

Over the 5-year period, IQM has performed better with a 20.00% return vs 9.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FV or IQM?

IQM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FV or IQM?

FV has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for IQM.

What is the main difference between FV and IQM?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for FV and 0.50% for IQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.