FV vs. BBUS
FV (First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - FV tracks the Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index while BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FV returned 10.37%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for BBUS. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FV charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
FV vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FV achieves a 18.14% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 10.60% return.
FV
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 11.69%
- YTD
- 18.14%
- 6M
- 18.84%
- 1Y
- 28.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.37%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
FV vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF | 18.14% | 7.23% | 14.73% | 11.34% | -3.93% | 21.63% | 28.36% | 6.42% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.60% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between FV and BBUS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between FV and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
FV vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FV
BBUS
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FV
BBUS
Industrials
FV
BBUS
Financial Services
FV
BBUS
Healthcare
FV
BBUS
Energy
FV
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
FV
BBUS
Communication Services
FV
BBUS
Real Estate
FV
BBUS
Basic Materials
FV
-
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
FV
-
BBUS
Utilities
FV
-
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FV vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
FV
BBUS
FV vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FV | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.42 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 3.00 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.12 | 13.76 | -5.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FV | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 2.33 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.79 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.84 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
FV vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FV drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FV and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FV | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.04% | -35.35% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.45% | -9.21% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.08% | -19.01% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.08% | -25.46% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.74% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.80% | -5.46% | -0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 2.00% | +1.57% |
Volatility
FV vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that FV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FV | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 2.88% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.54% | 8.96% | +3.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 11.87% | +3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 17.03% | +3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 19.59% | +1.83% |
FV vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FV has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
FV vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
FV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF | 0.52% | 0.63% | 0.14% | 0.47% | 1.38% | 0.11% | 0.06% | 0.56% | 0.19% | 0.67% | 0.95% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FV and BBUS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FV has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FV dropped -34.04% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 10.37% for FV. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 10.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FV.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.52% for FV.
FV tracks Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for FV and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FV and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer