PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUU.V vs. AEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FUU.V vs. AEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fission 3.0 Corp (FUU.V) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FUU.V is traded in CAD, while AEM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AEM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUU.V achieves a 6.67% return, which is significantly higher than AEM's 6.14% return. Over the past 10 years, FUU.V has underperformed AEM with an annualized return of -7.26%, while AEM has yielded a comparatively higher 16.53% annualized return.


FUU.V

1D
0.00%
1M
-13.51%
YTD
6.67%
6M
18.52%
1Y
-30.43%
3Y*
-20.63%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*
-7.26%

AEM

1D
3.07%
1M
1.59%
YTD
6.14%
6M
3.19%
1Y
46.78%
3Y*
54.87%
5Y*
26.54%
10Y*
16.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUU.V vs. AEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUU.V
Fission 3.0 Corp
6.67%-37.50%-40.00%26.98%43.18%131.58%35.71%-65.85%-14.58%-7.69%
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
6.14%109.46%58.58%6.58%8.28%-23.51%15.41%46.60%-4.00%3.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FUU.V and AEM is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2013

0.09

The correlation between FUU.V and AEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FUU.V:

CA$94.63M

AEM:

$88.68B

EPS

FUU.V:

-CA$0.00

AEM:

$10.60

PB Ratio

FUU.V:

1.14

AEM:

3.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

FUU.V:

CA$0.00

AEM:

$13.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FUU.V:

-CA$27.07K

AEM:

$8.28B

EBITDA (TTM)

FUU.V:

-CA$5.08M

AEM:

$9.72B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUU.V vs. AEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUU.V
FUU.V Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FUU.V Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUU.V Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUU.V Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FUU.V Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUU.V Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

AEM
AEM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
AEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
AEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUU.V vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fission 3.0 Corp (FUU.V) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUU.VAEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.21

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

1.52

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

3.71

-4.68

FUU.V vs. AEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUU.V Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the AEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUU.V and AEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUU.VAEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

1.12

-1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.77

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

0.46

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.27

-0.36

Drawdowns

FUU.V vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUU.V drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than AEM's maximum drawdown of -70.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUU.V and AEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUU.VAEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.16%

-70.22%

-26.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.77%

-30.88%

-24.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.30%

-30.88%

-47.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.30%

-42.09%

-36.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.32%

-54.39%

-39.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.82%

-28.52%

-53.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.24%

-30.61%

-41.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.26%

12.66%

+18.60%

Volatility

FUU.V vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison

Fission 3.0 Corp (FUU.V) has a higher volatility of 19.09% compared to Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) at 13.65%. This indicates that FUU.V's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUU.VAEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.09%

13.65%

+5.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

64.13%

33.68%

+30.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.13%

41.99%

+38.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.79%

34.80%

+58.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

102.02%

35.75%

+66.27%

Dividends

FUU.V vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison

FUU.V has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
0.96%0.94%2.05%2.92%3.08%2.63%2.36%0.89%1.09%0.89%0.86%1.22%
FUU.V
Fission 3.0 Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FUU.V vs. AEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fission 3.0 Corp and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B202220232024202520260
4.10B
(FUU.V) Total Revenue
(AEM) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FUU.V values in CAD, AEM values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


FUU.V and AEM have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUU.V and AEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer