PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUTY vs. GII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUTY vs. GII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUTY achieves a 3.78% return, which is significantly lower than GII's 8.32% return. Over the past 10 years, FUTY has outperformed GII with an annualized return of 9.10%, while GII has yielded a comparatively lower 8.29% annualized return.


FUTY

1D
0.60%
1M
-4.86%
YTD
3.78%
6M
1.95%
1Y
12.10%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
9.10%

GII

1D
0.54%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
8.32%
6M
8.21%
1Y
15.99%
3Y*
16.21%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
8.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUTY vs. GII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
3.78%16.40%23.20%-7.46%1.12%17.53%-0.80%24.89%4.36%12.52%
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
8.32%21.79%14.30%5.90%-0.54%11.39%-6.81%26.32%-10.08%19.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FUTY and GII is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.65

The correlation between FUTY and GII shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.76 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FUTY vs. GII - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FUTY
GII

Utilities

99.2%
26.5%

Energy

0.5%
21.5%

Industrials

0.2%
27.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

4.5%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

2.5%

Utilities

FUTY
99.2%
GII
26.5%

Energy

FUTY
0.5%
GII
21.5%

Industrials

FUTY
0.2%
GII
27.1%

Basic Materials

FUTY

-

GII

-

Communication Services

FUTY

-

GII
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FUTY

-

GII

-

Consumer Defensive

FUTY

-

GII

-

Financial Services

FUTY

-

GII
4.5%

Healthcare

FUTY

-

GII

-

Real Estate

FUTY

-

GII
0.1%

Technology

FUTY

-

GII
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUTY vs. GII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUTY
FUTY Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FUTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTY Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

GII
GII Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GII Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GII Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GII Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
GII Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUTY vs. GII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUTYGIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.27

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

2.70

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.05

8.34

-5.29

FUTY vs. GII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the GII Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUTY and GII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUTYGIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.50

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.73

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.48

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.29

+0.27

Drawdowns

FUTY vs. GII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUTY drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, smaller than the maximum GII drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTY and GII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUTYGIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.44%

-50.98%

+14.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-5.94%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.35%

-14.31%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.11%

-20.67%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.44%

-42.84%

+6.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.72%

-4.03%

-2.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-11.52%

+5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

1.92%

+2.06%

Volatility

FUTY vs. GII - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) at 3.84%. This indicates that FUTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUTYGIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

3.84%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.38%

8.80%

+2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.34%

10.75%

+3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.08%

14.11%

+2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

17.14%

+1.91%

FUTY vs. GII - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUTY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GII's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUTY vs. GII - Dividend Comparison

FUTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than GII's 2.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
2.60%2.67%2.96%3.31%2.72%2.70%3.07%2.82%3.11%3.03%3.35%4.33%
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
2.70%3.17%3.23%3.70%3.07%2.37%2.66%3.39%3.31%3.38%3.11%3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUTY and GII have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUTY has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to GII (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUTY dropped -36.44% vs GII's -50.98%.

On 10-year performance, FUTY leads with 9.10% vs 8.29% for GII. On fees, FUTY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GII has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FUTY has performed better with a 9.10% return vs 8.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FUTY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GII.

GII has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 2.60% for FUTY.

FUTY tracks MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index, while GII tracks S&P Global Infrastructure. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FUTY and 0.40% for GII.

GII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUTY and GII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer