PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUTU vs. AMDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUTU vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUTU achieves a -40.74% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 360.26% return.


FUTU

1D
-0.46%
1M
-39.08%
YTD
-40.74%
6M
-43.05%
1Y
-13.22%
3Y*
36.55%
5Y*
-8.43%
10Y*

AMDL

1D
-7.05%
1M
102.52%
YTD
360.26%
6M
344.53%
1Y
1,075.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUTU vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FUTU
Futu Holdings Limited
-40.74%105.29%43.69%
AMDL
GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF
360.26%103.00%-69.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FUTU and AMDL is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2024

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUTU vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUTU
FUTU Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FUTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTU Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTU Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDL
AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUTU vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUTUAMDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-8.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.61

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

19.36

-19.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.70

38.01

-38.71

FUTU vs. AMDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the AMDL Sharpe Ratio of 8.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUTU and AMDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUTUAMDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

8.38

-8.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.51

-0.12

Drawdowns

FUTU vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUTU drawdown since its inception was -87.23%, roughly equal to the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTU and AMDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUTUAMDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.23%

-88.63%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.18%

-56.13%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.11%

-7.05%

-44.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.54%

-48.51%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.97%

28.54%

-9.57%

Volatility

FUTU vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is 41.95%, while GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a volatility of 47.19%. This indicates that FUTU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUTUAMDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.95%

47.19%

-5.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.74%

94.32%

-43.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.78%

129.64%

-65.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.80%

116.59%

-43.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.26%

116.59%

-41.33%

Dividends

FUTU vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

FUTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
AMDL
GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
FUTU
Futu Holdings Limited
2.71%0.00%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUTU and AMDL have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDL has higher volatility (47.19%) compared to FUTU (41.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUTU dropped -87.23% vs AMDL's -88.63%.

AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.38 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUTU and AMDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer