FUTG vs. AMDL
FUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF) and AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FUTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for AMDL.
Performance
FUTG vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUTG achieves a -75.77% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 361.86% return.
FUTG
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -50.89%
- YTD
- -75.77%
- 6M
- -75.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDL
- 1D
- 9.38%
- 1M
- 33.94%
- YTD
- 361.86%
- 6M
- 363.06%
- 1Y
- 923.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FUTG vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF | -75.77% | -0.20% |
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF | 361.86% | -10.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUTG and AMDL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUTG vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank
FUTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AMDL
FUTG vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FUTG | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.56 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 17.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 33.11 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUTG vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUTG drawdown since its inception was -86.19%, roughly equal to the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTG and AMDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUTG | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.19% | -88.63% | +2.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -56.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.45% | -6.73% | -77.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.97% | -47.88% | +4.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 28.80% | — |
Volatility
FUTG vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUTG | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 48.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 101.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 132.39% | 133.77% | -1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 132.39% | 118.39% | +14.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 132.39% | 118.39% | +14.00% |
FUTG vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDL's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FUTG vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison
Neither FUTG nor AMDL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FUTG and AMDL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMDL.
FUTG and AMDL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FUTG and 1.15% for AMDL.
Find the right allocation for FUTG and AMDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer