FUNL vs. PWV
FUNL (CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL) and PWV (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. FUNL is actively managed, while PWV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FUNL returned 9.42%/yr vs 12.50%/yr for PWV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FUNL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PWV.
Performance
FUNL vs. PWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUNL achieves a 5.66% return, which is significantly lower than PWV's 12.10% return.
FUNL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.66%
- 6M
- 7.22%
- 1Y
- 18.97%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
PWV
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 6M
- 12.38%
- 1Y
- 25.33%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
FUNL vs. PWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL | 5.66% | 14.62% | 15.55% | 14.33% | -5.76% | 25.93% | 14.92% |
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF | 12.10% | 19.65% | 14.48% | 10.36% | -1.16% | 29.06% | 12.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUNL and PWV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2020 | 0.89 |
The correlation between FUNL and PWV shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUNL vs. PWV — Risk / Return Rank
FUNL
PWV
FUNL vs. PWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FUNL | PWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.48 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.01 | 6.28 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.31 | 21.16 | +2.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FUNL | PWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.74 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.88 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.41 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
FUNL vs. PWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUNL drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, smaller than the maximum PWV drawdown of -49.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUNL and PWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUNL | PWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.35% | -49.04% | +29.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.83% | -4.05% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | -14.31% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.35% | -16.36% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.51% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -9.50% | +5.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.82% | 1.20% | -0.38% |
Volatility
FUNL vs. PWV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) is 0.00%, while Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) has a volatility of 2.35%. This indicates that FUNL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUNL | PWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 2.35% | -2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.24% | 6.62% | -1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.82% | 9.31% | -0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 14.35% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 17.16% | -1.87% |
FUNL vs. PWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUNL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PWV's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
FUNL vs. PWV - Dividend Comparison
FUNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than PWV's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL | 2.25% | 2.10% | 1.78% | 1.69% | 1.84% | 1.55% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF | 1.81% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.16% | 2.29% | 1.89% | 2.66% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.55% | 2.35% | 2.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FUNL and PWV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWV has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to FUNL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUNL dropped -19.35% vs PWV's -49.04%.
On 5-year performance, PWV leads with 12.50% vs 9.42% for FUNL. On fees, FUNL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FUNL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PWV has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 9.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FUNL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PWV.
FUNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 1.81% for PWV.
They also come from different issuers: CornerCap and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FUNL and 0.58% for PWV.
PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FUNL and PWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer