PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUN vs. BKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FUN vs. BKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) and Baker Hughes Company (BKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUN achieves a 52.80% return, which is significantly higher than BKR's 39.64% return.


FUN

1D
-3.90%
1M
9.94%
YTD
52.80%
6M
57.21%
1Y
-21.53%
3Y*
-16.99%
5Y*
-11.16%
10Y*
-5.82%

BKR

1D
-0.54%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
39.64%
6M
35.70%
1Y
64.52%
3Y*
30.72%
5Y*
22.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUN vs. BKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUN
Cedar Fair, L.P.
52.80%-68.17%26.39%-0.96%-16.23%27.25%-27.49%25.65%-22.66%-7.14%
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
39.64%13.39%23.11%18.58%25.96%19.03%-15.15%23.01%-30.43%-21.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FUN and BKR is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2017

0.20

The correlation between FUN and BKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FUN:

$2.38B

BKR:

$62.89B

EPS

FUN:

-$16.06

BKR:

$3.14

PS Ratio

FUN:

0.82

BKR:

2.25

PB Ratio

FUN:

0.26

BKR:

2.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

FUN:

$2.90B

BKR:

$27.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FUN:

$1.59B

BKR:

$6.57B

EBITDA (TTM)

FUN:

-$733.45M

BKR:

$4.20B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUN vs. BKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUN
FUN Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUN Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

BKR
BKR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUN vs. BKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) and Baker Hughes Company (BKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUNBKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.34

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

3.95

-4.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.66

11.78

-12.44

FUN vs. BKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUN Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the BKR Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUN and BKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUN vs. BKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUN drawdown since its inception was -77.75%, roughly equal to the maximum BKR drawdown of -75.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUN and BKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUNBKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.75%

-75.38%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.05%

-16.86%

-44.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.74%

-28.00%

-49.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.74%

-46.53%

-31.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.33%

-9.07%

-50.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.87%

-24.66%

+4.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.79%

5.64%

+34.15%

Volatility

FUN vs. BKR - Volatility Comparison

Cedar Fair, L.P. (FUN) has a higher volatility of 15.26% compared to Baker Hughes Company (BKR) at 11.29%. This indicates that FUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUNBKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.26%

11.29%

+3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.94%

24.84%

+20.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.85%

33.14%

+33.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.02%

35.09%

+8.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.15%

40.20%

+4.95%

Dividends

FUN vs. BKR - Dividend Comparison

FUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
1.46%2.02%2.05%2.28%2.47%2.99%3.45%2.81%3.35%56.42%0.00%0.00%
FUN
Cedar Fair, L.P.
0.00%0.00%4.42%3.02%1.45%0.00%2.38%6.69%7.60%5.32%5.19%5.51%

Financials

FUN vs. BKR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cedar Fair, L.P. and Baker Hughes Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B202220232024202520260
6.59B
(FUN) Total Revenue
(BKR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FUN and BKR have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUN has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to BKR (11.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUN dropped -77.75% vs BKR's -75.38%.

BKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUN and BKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer