PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FULSX vs. FFFCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FULSX vs. FFFCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2020 Fund (FULSX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FULSX achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly higher than FFFCX's 5.33% return.


FULSX

1D
0.41%
1M
2.94%
YTD
7.57%
6M
8.20%
1Y
17.86%
3Y*
12.25%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*

FFFCX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.88%
YTD
5.33%
6M
5.67%
1Y
12.68%
3Y*
9.08%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
5.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FULSX vs. FFFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FULSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2020 Fund
7.57%14.78%7.59%13.27%-16.10%9.09%13.57%18.28%-4.84%6.93%
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
5.33%11.39%5.26%9.82%-13.21%5.64%11.09%14.34%-3.74%5.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FULSX and FFFCX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.97

The correlation between FULSX and FFFCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FULSX vs. FFFCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FULSX
FULSX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FULSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FULSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FULSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FULSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FULSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FFFCX
FFFCX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FFFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FULSX vs. FFFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2020 Fund (FULSX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FULSXFFFCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.53

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

3.20

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.49

13.95

+0.54

FULSX vs. FFFCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FULSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the FFFCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FULSX and FFFCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FULSXFFFCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.59

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.58

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.68

+0.11

Drawdowns

FULSX vs. FFFCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FULSX drawdown since its inception was -22.52%, smaller than the maximum FFFCX drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FULSX and FFFCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FULSXFFFCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.52%

-36.88%

+14.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.42%

-4.00%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.70%

-5.83%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.52%

-18.35%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-4.57%

+0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

0.92%

+0.33%

Volatility

FULSX vs. FFFCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2020 Fund (FULSX) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) at 2.02%. This indicates that FULSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FULSXFFFCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

2.02%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.77%

4.15%

+1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.95%

4.95%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.97%

6.38%

+2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.30%

6.30%

+3.00%

FULSX vs. FFFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FULSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFCX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FULSX vs. FFFCX - Dividend Comparison

FULSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.78%, more than FFFCX's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
4.66%4.97%2.99%2.72%7.23%9.33%6.01%5.78%6.98%4.82%3.22%3.68%
FULSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2020 Fund
30.78%7.84%2.85%2.82%5.22%6.27%4.48%6.03%6.15%2.62%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FULSX and FFFCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FULSX has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to FFFCX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FULSX dropped -22.52% vs FFFCX's -36.88%.

FULSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FULSX and FFFCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer