PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FULSX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FULSX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2020 Fund (FULSX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FULSX having a 7.57% return and FCNTX slightly higher at 7.76%.


FULSX

1D
0.41%
1M
2.94%
YTD
7.57%
6M
8.20%
1Y
17.86%
3Y*
12.25%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*

FCNTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.65%
YTD
7.76%
6M
10.05%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
17.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FULSX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FULSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2020 Fund
7.57%14.78%7.59%13.27%-16.10%9.09%13.57%18.28%-4.84%6.93%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
7.76%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%12.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FULSX and FCNTX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.81

The correlation between FULSX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FULSX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FULSX
FULSX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FULSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FULSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FULSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FULSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FULSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FULSX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2020 Fund (FULSX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FULSXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.31

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

2.13

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.49

9.04

+5.45

FULSX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FULSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FULSX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FULSXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

1.72

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.79

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.78

+0.01

Drawdowns

FULSX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FULSX drawdown since its inception was -22.52%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FULSX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FULSXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.52%

-49.19%

+26.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.42%

-11.30%

+5.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.70%

-19.75%

+12.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.52%

-32.59%

+10.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.53%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-8.16%

+3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

2.65%

-1.40%

Volatility

FULSX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2020 Fund (FULSX) is 2.60%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that FULSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FULSXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

3.26%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.77%

10.48%

-4.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.95%

14.03%

-7.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.97%

19.15%

-10.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.30%

19.68%

-10.38%

FULSX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FULSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FULSX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FULSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.78%, more than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.33%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FULSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2020 Fund
30.78%7.84%2.85%2.82%5.22%6.27%4.48%6.03%6.15%2.62%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FULSX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCNTX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to FULSX (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FULSX dropped -22.52% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FULSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FULSX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer