FTXR vs. QCLN
FTXR (First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF) and QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FTXR is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Transportation Index, while QCLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTXR returned 6.66%/yr vs 2.16%/yr for QCLN. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
FTXR vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXR achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 52.94% return.
FTXR
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 11.32%
- YTD
- 14.58%
- 6M
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 43.09%
- 3Y*
- 19.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- —
QCLN
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 16.40%
- YTD
- 52.94%
- 6M
- 50.79%
- 1Y
- 120.21%
- 3Y*
- 12.03%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
FTXR vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXR First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF | 14.58% | 14.70% | 17.09% | 20.93% | -25.38% | 24.02% | 15.03% | 14.82% | -15.27% | 15.82% |
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 52.94% | 31.81% | -18.86% | -10.02% | -30.37% | -3.21% | 184.00% | 42.65% | -12.38% | 32.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXR and QCLN is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016 | 0.62 |
The correlation between FTXR and QCLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
FTXR vs. QCLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTXR
QCLN
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
FTXR
QCLN
Consumer Cyclical
FTXR
QCLN
Energy
FTXR
QCLN
Basic Materials
FTXR
-
QCLN
Communication Services
FTXR
-
QCLN
-
Consumer Defensive
FTXR
-
QCLN
-
Financial Services
FTXR
-
QCLN
Healthcare
FTXR
-
QCLN
-
Real Estate
FTXR
-
QCLN
-
Technology
FTXR
-
QCLN
Utilities
FTXR
-
QCLN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXR vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank
FTXR
QCLN
FTXR vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTXR | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.99 | 3.49 | -1.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.80 | 3.86 | -1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.48 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 7.62 | -4.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.08 | 26.28 | -16.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTXR | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 3.49 | -1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.06 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.20 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
FTXR vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXR drawdown since its inception was -52.06%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXR and QCLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXR | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.06% | -76.18% | +24.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.49% | -15.86% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.71% | -56.08% | +26.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.96% | -69.49% | +35.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -20.99% | +19.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.06% | -43.45% | +32.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 4.59% | -0.30% |
Volatility
FTXR vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) is 6.70%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 12.56%. This indicates that FTXR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXR | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.70% | 12.56% | -5.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.48% | 26.02% | -9.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.79% | 34.88% | -13.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.85% | 37.97% | -14.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.75% | 34.91% | -10.16% |
FTXR vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FTXR and QCLN have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
FTXR vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison
FTXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than QCLN's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXR First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF | 1.14% | 1.52% | 2.13% | 1.50% | 2.38% | 0.67% | 0.33% | 1.34% | 1.74% | 1.18% | 0.24% | 0.00% |
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.87% | 0.76% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.30% | 0.85% | 1.03% | 0.45% | 1.24% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTXR and QCLN have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCLN has higher volatility (12.56%) compared to FTXR (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXR dropped -52.06% vs QCLN's -76.18%.
On 5-year performance, FTXR leads with 6.66% vs 2.16% for QCLN. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, FTXR has been the lower-risk option at 6.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXR has performed better with a 6.66% return vs 2.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTXR and QCLN have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
FTXR has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.15% for QCLN.
FTXR is categorized as Industrials Equities, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. FTXR tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Transportation Index, while QCLN tracks NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy.
QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTXR and QCLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer