PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTXR vs. QCLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTXR vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXR achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 52.94% return.


FTXR

1D
-0.02%
1M
11.32%
YTD
14.58%
6M
18.08%
1Y
43.09%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*

QCLN

1D
-0.41%
1M
16.40%
YTD
52.94%
6M
50.79%
1Y
120.21%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
17.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTXR vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTXR
First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF
14.58%14.70%17.09%20.93%-25.38%24.02%15.03%14.82%-15.27%15.82%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
52.94%31.81%-18.86%-10.02%-30.37%-3.21%184.00%42.65%-12.38%32.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FTXR and QCLN is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016

0.62

The correlation between FTXR and QCLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTXR vs. QCLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTXR
QCLN

Industrials

67.1%
30.2%

Consumer Cyclical

32.4%
9.4%

Energy

0.6%
13.2%

Basic Materials

-

9.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

1.9%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

20.8%

Utilities

-

13.2%

Industrials

FTXR
67.1%
QCLN
30.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FTXR
32.4%
QCLN
9.4%

Energy

FTXR
0.6%
QCLN
13.2%

Basic Materials

FTXR

-

QCLN
9.4%

Communication Services

FTXR

-

QCLN

-

Consumer Defensive

FTXR

-

QCLN

-

Financial Services

FTXR

-

QCLN
1.9%

Healthcare

FTXR

-

QCLN

-

Real Estate

FTXR

-

QCLN

-

Technology

FTXR

-

QCLN
20.8%

Utilities

FTXR

-

QCLN
13.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTXR vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTXR
FTXR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FTXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXR Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLN
QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXR vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTXRQCLNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

3.49

-1.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.80

3.86

-1.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.48

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

7.62

-4.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.08

26.28

-16.20

FTXR vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTXR Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is lower than the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTXR and QCLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTXRQCLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

3.49

-1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.06

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.20

+0.20

Drawdowns

FTXR vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXR drawdown since its inception was -52.06%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXR and QCLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTXRQCLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.06%

-76.18%

+24.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.49%

-15.86%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.71%

-56.08%

+26.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.96%

-69.49%

+35.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-20.99%

+19.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.06%

-43.45%

+32.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

4.59%

-0.30%

Volatility

FTXR vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) is 6.70%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 12.56%. This indicates that FTXR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTXRQCLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.70%

12.56%

-5.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.48%

26.02%

-9.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.79%

34.88%

-13.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.85%

37.97%

-14.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.75%

34.91%

-10.16%

FTXR vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FTXR and QCLN have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

FTXR vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

FTXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than QCLN's 0.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTXR
First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF
1.14%1.52%2.13%1.50%2.38%0.67%0.33%1.34%1.74%1.18%0.24%0.00%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
0.15%0.25%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.24%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTXR and QCLN have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCLN has higher volatility (12.56%) compared to FTXR (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXR dropped -52.06% vs QCLN's -76.18%.

On 5-year performance, FTXR leads with 6.66% vs 2.16% for QCLN. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, FTXR has been the lower-risk option at 6.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTXR has performed better with a 6.66% return vs 2.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTXR and QCLN have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

FTXR has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.15% for QCLN.

FTXR is categorized as Industrials Equities, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. FTXR tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Transportation Index, while QCLN tracks NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy.

QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTXR and QCLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer