FTXR vs. COMT
FTXR (First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTXR is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Transportation Index, while COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTXR returned 9.44%/yr vs 11.75%/yr for COMT. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTXR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
FTXR vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXR achieves a 18.26% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 30.19% return.
FTXR
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- YTD
- 18.26%
- 1Y
- 41.03%
- 3Y*
- 16.12%
- 5Y*
- 9.44%
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 26.18%
- YTD
- 30.19%
- 1Y
- 33.20%
- 3Y*
- 12.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
FTXR vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXR First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF | 18.26% | 14.70% | 17.09% | 20.93% | -25.38% | 24.02% | 15.03% | 14.82% | -15.27% | 15.82% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 30.19% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | 19.45% | 36.88% | -18.66% | 10.81% | -6.67% | 11.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXR and COMT is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.17 |
The correlation between FTXR and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXR vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
FTXR
COMT
FTXR vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTXR | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.27 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 1.90 | +0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.65 | 6.35 | +3.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTXR vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXR drawdown since its inception was -52.06%, roughly equal to the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXR and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXR | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.06% | -51.89% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.49% | -17.57% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.71% | -17.57% | -12.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.96% | -29.00% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -11.28% | +11.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.94% | -23.95% | +13.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.26% | 5.24% | -0.98% |
Volatility
FTXR vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) is 5.51%, while iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that FTXR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXR | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 5.91% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.27% | 19.67% | -2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.59% | 21.54% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.97% | 21.20% | +2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.71% | 18.85% | +5.86% |
FTXR vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXR vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
FTXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than COMT's 5.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 5.95% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
FTXR First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF | 0.95% | 1.52% | 2.13% | 1.50% | 2.38% | 0.67% | 0.33% | 1.34% | 1.74% | 1.18% | 0.24% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTXR and COMT have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to FTXR (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXR dropped -52.06% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 5-year performance, COMT leads with 11.75% vs 9.44% for FTXR. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, FTXR has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COMT has performed better with a 11.75% return vs 9.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXR.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 0.95% for FTXR.
FTXR is categorized as Industrials Equities, while COMT is Commodities. FTXR tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Transportation Index, while COMT tracks S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXR and 0.48% for COMT.
FTXR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTXR and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer