FTXO vs. QQQI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FTXO (First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTXO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ US Banks Index, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. FTXO is passively managed, while QQQI is actively managed. Over the past year, FTXO returned 28.90% vs 29.68% for QQQI. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTXO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

FTXO vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXO achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 13.04% return.

FTXO

• 1D: 3.42%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 4.26%
• 6M: 7.64%
• 1Y: 28.90%
• 3Y*: 26.19%
• 5Y*: 6.06%
• 10Y*: —

QQQI

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 5.60%
• YTD: 13.04%
• 6M: 12.57%
• 1Y: 29.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTXO vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FTXO First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF	4.26%	21.32%	25.24%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.04%	18.62%	19.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FTXO and QQQI is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024	0.40

FTXO vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTXO	QQQI
Financial Services	100.0%	0.3%
Technology	0.4%	53.3%
Basic Materials	-	1.2%
Communication Services	-	15.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Energy	-	0.7%
Healthcare	-	4.3%
Industrials	-	3.3%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.5%

Return for Risk

FTXO vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTXO

FTXO Risk / Return Rank: 37
FTXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FTXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FTXO Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FTXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FTXO Martin Ratio Rank: 33

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 70
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXO vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTXO	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	2.30	-0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	3.05	-1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.42	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.74	3.10	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.82	13.93	-9.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTXO vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTXO Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTXO and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTXO	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	2.30	-0.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	1.32	-1.00

Drawdowns

FTXO vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXO drawdown since its inception was -55.26%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXO and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTXO	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.26%	-20.00%	-35.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.69%	-9.61%	-7.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.95%	-0.52%	-4.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.87%	-2.19%	-13.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.02%	2.14%	+3.88%

Volatility

FTXO vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 2.69%. This indicates that FTXO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTXO	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.52%	2.69%	+3.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.81%	9.85%	+5.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.02%	12.98%	+8.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.05%	17.05%	+10.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.00%	17.05%	+12.95%

FTXO vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTXO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTXO vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

FTXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than QQQI's 13.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FTXO First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF	1.72%	1.92%	2.18%	3.20%	2.94%	1.64%	2.74%	2.53%	3.51%	1.09%	0.16%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.24%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTXO and QQQI in my portfolio?

FTXO and QQQI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTXO or QQQI?

FTXO has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to QQQI (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXO dropped -55.26% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

Which ETF is better, FTXO or QQQI?

On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 29.68% vs 28.90% for FTXO. On fees, FTXO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTXO or QQQI?

Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 29.68% return vs 28.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTXO or QQQI?

FTXO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTXO or QQQI?

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.24%, compared with 1.72% for FTXO.

What is the main difference between FTXO and QQQI?

FTXO is categorized as Financials Equities, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXO and 0.68% for QQQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.