PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTXG vs. PSCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTXG vs. PSCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXG achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly higher than PSCC's 5.02% return.


FTXG

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
5.86%
6M
4.05%
1Y
0.33%
3Y*
-3.08%
5Y*
-1.45%
10Y*

PSCC

1D
-0.25%
1M
-2.21%
YTD
5.02%
6M
3.53%
1Y
-5.46%
3Y*
-1.89%
5Y*
-0.60%
10Y*
6.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTXG vs. PSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTXG
First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF
5.86%-6.52%-2.52%-6.48%6.15%13.48%6.63%23.97%-12.09%5.64%
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
5.02%-16.47%0.98%14.83%-6.66%28.82%11.17%17.39%-6.72%9.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FTXG and PSCC is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2016

0.52

The correlation between FTXG and PSCC shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.64 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTXG vs. PSCC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTXG
PSCC

Consumer Defensive

94.0%
90.4%

Basic Materials

4.3%
3.8%

Industrials

1.7%
3.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.9%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

FTXG
94.0%
PSCC
90.4%

Basic Materials

FTXG
4.3%
PSCC
3.8%

Industrials

FTXG
1.7%
PSCC
3.0%

Communication Services

FTXG

-

PSCC

-

Consumer Cyclical

FTXG

-

PSCC
2.9%

Energy

FTXG

-

PSCC

-

Financial Services

FTXG

-

PSCC

-

Healthcare

FTXG

-

PSCC

-

Real Estate

FTXG

-

PSCC

-

Technology

FTXG

-

PSCC

-

Utilities

FTXG

-

PSCC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTXG vs. PSCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTXG
FTXG Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FTXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXG Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCC
PSCC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXG vs. PSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTXGPSCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.96

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

-0.36

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.06

-0.63

+0.69

FTXG vs. PSCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTXG Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is higher than the PSCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTXG and PSCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTXGPSCCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

-0.33

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

-0.03

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.55

-0.37

Drawdowns

FTXG vs. PSCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXG drawdown since its inception was -31.52%, smaller than the maximum PSCC drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXG and PSCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTXGPSCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.52%

-33.61%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.14%

-15.17%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.10%

-23.36%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.68%

-23.36%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.76%

-18.00%

+3.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-5.97%

-1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.40%

8.68%

-3.28%

Volatility

FTXG vs. PSCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) is 3.29%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) has a volatility of 4.46%. This indicates that FTXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTXGPSCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

4.46%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

10.73%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.60%

16.47%

-2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.46%

18.24%

-3.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

19.29%

-2.66%

FTXG vs. PSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTXG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCC's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTXG vs. PSCC - Dividend Comparison

FTXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than PSCC's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTXG
First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF
2.75%2.93%2.75%4.27%1.50%1.52%1.35%1.25%1.37%1.56%0.30%0.00%
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
2.12%2.35%1.88%1.49%1.29%1.21%1.59%1.77%0.94%1.25%1.48%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTXG and PSCC have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCC has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to FTXG (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXG dropped -31.52% vs PSCC's -33.61%.

On 5-year performance, PSCC leads with -0.60% vs -1.45% for FTXG. On fees, PSCC is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FTXG has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PSCC has performed better with a -0.60% return vs -1.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCC is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXG.

FTXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 2.12% for PSCC.

FTXG tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Food & Beverage Index, while PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXG and 0.29% for PSCC.

FTXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTXG and PSCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer