FTXG vs. MOO
FTXG (First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF) and MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTXG is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Food & Beverage Index, while MOO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTXG returned -1.45%/yr vs -0.70%/yr for MOO. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTXG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MOO.
Performance
FTXG vs. MOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXG achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than MOO's 10.10% return.
FTXG
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- 5.86%
- 6M
- 4.05%
- 1Y
- 0.33%
- 3Y*
- -3.08%
- 5Y*
- -1.45%
- 10Y*
- —
MOO
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- YTD
- 10.10%
- 6M
- 11.54%
- 1Y
- 13.06%
- 3Y*
- 3.07%
- 5Y*
- -0.70%
- 10Y*
- 7.00%
FTXG vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXG First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF | 5.86% | -6.52% | -2.52% | -6.48% | 6.15% | 13.48% | 6.63% | 23.97% | -12.09% | 5.64% |
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 10.10% | 15.61% | -12.43% | -8.57% | -8.10% | 23.99% | 14.59% | 22.29% | -6.03% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXG and MOO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2016 | 0.48 |
The correlation between FTXG and MOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
FTXG vs. MOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTXG
MOO
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
FTXG
MOO
Basic Materials
FTXG
MOO
Industrials
FTXG
MOO
Communication Services
FTXG
-
MOO
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTXG
-
MOO
-
Energy
FTXG
-
MOO
-
Financial Services
FTXG
-
MOO
-
Healthcare
FTXG
-
MOO
Real Estate
FTXG
-
MOO
-
Technology
FTXG
-
MOO
-
Utilities
FTXG
-
MOO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXG vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank
FTXG
MOO
FTXG vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTXG | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.17 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 1.55 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.06 | 3.88 | -3.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTXG | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 0.95 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | -0.04 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.22 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
FTXG vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXG drawdown since its inception was -31.52%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXG and MOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXG | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.52% | -69.53% | +38.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.14% | -8.45% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.10% | -26.83% | +8.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.68% | -39.52% | +17.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.76% | -17.50% | +2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -16.97% | +9.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.40% | 3.37% | +2.03% |
Volatility
FTXG vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) is 3.29%, while VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that FTXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXG | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 4.08% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.62% | 10.57% | -0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.60% | 13.88% | -0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 17.12% | -2.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 18.19% | -1.56% |
FTXG vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MOO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXG vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison
FTXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than MOO's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXG First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF | 2.75% | 2.93% | 2.75% | 4.27% | 1.50% | 1.52% | 1.35% | 1.25% | 1.37% | 1.56% | 0.30% | 0.00% |
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 2.24% | 2.47% | 3.41% | 2.93% | 2.15% | 1.17% | 1.10% | 1.26% | 1.69% | 1.44% | 2.14% | 2.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTXG and MOO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOO has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to FTXG (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXG dropped -31.52% vs MOO's -69.53%.
On 5-year performance, MOO leads with -0.70% vs -1.45% for FTXG. On fees, MOO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, FTXG has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MOO has performed better with a -0.70% return vs -1.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXG.
FTXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 2.24% for MOO.
FTXG is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while MOO is Large Cap Blend Equities. FTXG tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Food & Beverage Index, while MOO tracks MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXG and 0.55% for MOO.
MOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTXG and MOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer