FTWO vs. USNG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FTWO (Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF) and USNG (Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. FTWO is passively managed, while USNG is actively managed. Over the past year, FTWO returned 24.37% vs 47.43% for USNG. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTWO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for USNG.

Performance

FTWO vs. USNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTWO achieves a 7.77% return, which is significantly lower than USNG's 36.17% return.

FTWO

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: -2.45%
• YTD: 7.77%
• 6M: 6.31%
• 1Y: 24.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USNG

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -0.64%
• YTD: 36.17%
• 6M: 36.35%
• 1Y: 47.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTWO vs. USNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	7.77%	23.30%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	36.17%	10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FTWO and USNG is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2025	0.49

FTWO vs. USNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTWO	USNG
Industrials	33.1%	12.8%
Energy	27.9%	79.2%
Basic Materials	26.8%	1.4%
Utilities	11.2%	4.7%
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Financial Services	-	1.8%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

FTWO vs. USNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTWO

FTWO Risk / Return Rank: 37
FTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 36
FTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 35

USNG

USNG Risk / Return Rank: 91
USNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
USNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
USNG Omega Ratio Rank: 86
USNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
USNG Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTWO vs. USNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTWO	USNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	2.86	-1.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	3.85	-2.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.48	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	6.99	-5.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.88	21.05	-16.17

FTWO vs. USNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the USNG Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTWO and USNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTWO vs. USNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTWO drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, which is greater than USNG's maximum drawdown of -6.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTWO and USNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTWO	USNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.17%	-6.82%	-11.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.55%	-6.82%	-7.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.75%	-0.64%	-11.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.57%	-1.52%	-2.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.00%	2.26%	+2.74%

Volatility

FTWO vs. USNG - Volatility Comparison

Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) have volatilities of 6.27% and 6.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTWO	USNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.27%	6.29%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.08%	12.47%	+2.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.71%	16.68%	+2.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.31%	16.61%	+2.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.31%	16.61%	+2.70%

FTWO vs. USNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than USNG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTWO vs. USNG - Dividend Comparison

FTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than USNG's 1.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	1.04%	1.02%	1.23%	0.59%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	1.09%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTWO and USNG in my portfolio?

FTWO and USNG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTWO or USNG?

USNG has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to FTWO (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTWO dropped -18.17% vs USNG's -6.82%.

Which ETF is better, FTWO or USNG?

On 1-year performance, USNG leads with 47.43% vs 24.37% for FTWO. On fees, FTWO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTWO or USNG?

Over the 1-year period, USNG has performed better with a 47.43% return vs 24.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTWO or USNG?

FTWO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for USNG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTWO or USNG?

USNG has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 1.04% for FTWO.

What is the main difference between FTWO and USNG?

They also come from different issuers: Strive and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FTWO and 0.59% for USNG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.