FTWO vs. INFR

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FTWO (Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF) and INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - FTWO tracks the Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index while INFR tracks the RARE Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTWO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for INFR.

Performance

FTWO vs. INFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FTWO

• 1D: -1.49%
• 1M: -5.33%
• 6M: -4.99%
• YTD: 4.69%
• 1Y: 19.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INFR

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTWO vs. INFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	4.69%	43.06%	14.97%	0.75%
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	1.41%	24.00%	-6.23%	4.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FTWO and INFR is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023	0.32

FTWO vs. INFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTWO	INFR
Industrials	33.1%	27.5%
Energy	27.9%	-
Basic Materials	26.8%	-
Utilities	11.2%	68.5%
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	4.1%
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

FTWO vs. INFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTWO

FTWO Risk / Return Rank: 32
FTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 29

INFR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTWO vs. INFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTWO	INFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.24	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FTWO	INFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.28%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.78%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.96%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTWO	INFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.86%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.80%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.75%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.20%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.20%	—	—

FTWO vs. INFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTWO vs. INFR - Dividend Comparison

FTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, while INFR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	0.96%	1.02%	1.23%	0.59%
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	1.71%	2.52%	2.36%	3.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTWO and INFR in my portfolio?

FTWO and INFR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTWO or INFR?

On fees, FTWO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTWO or INFR?

FTWO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for INFR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTWO or INFR?

INFR has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.96% for FTWO.

What is the main difference between FTWO and INFR?

FTWO tracks Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index, while INFR tracks RARE Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and ClearBridge. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FTWO and 0.59% for INFR.