FTVFX vs. HWMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M (FTVFX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX).
FTVFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 23, 2003. HWMIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jan 2, 1997.
Performance
FTVFX vs. HWMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTVFX vs. HWMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTVFX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M | 2.88% | 10.74% | 9.80% | 19.10% | -9.60% | 34.39% | 9.19% | 31.01% | -18.21% | 14.69% |
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 6.74% | 7.87% | 3.62% | 19.87% | 1.63% | 39.18% | 0.49% | 12.97% | -19.32% | 7.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTVFX achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than HWMIX's 6.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FTVFX has outperformed HWMIX with an annualized return of 10.55%, while HWMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.08% annualized return.
FTVFX
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -6.26%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- 1Y
- 20.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
HWMIX
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTVFX vs. HWMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTVFX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HWMIX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTVFX vs. HWMIX — Risk / Return Rank
FTVFX
HWMIX
FTVFX vs. HWMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M (FTVFX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTVFX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 0.93 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.41 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.21 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 1.35 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.60 | 5.49 | +0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTVFX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 0.93 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.44 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.36 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.47 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTVFX and HWMIX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FTVFX vs. HWMIX - Dividend Comparison
FTVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.94%, more than HWMIX's 1.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTVFX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M | 7.94% | 8.17% | 12.39% | 0.62% | 0.12% | 4.24% | 0.24% | 2.83% | 14.49% | 2.94% | 0.43% | 1.87% |
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.31% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.28% | 0.49% | 1.28% | 2.25% | 1.60% | 2.99% | 6.72% | 1.53% | 14.67% |
Drawdowns
FTVFX vs. HWMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTVFX drawdown since its inception was -67.12%, roughly equal to the maximum HWMIX drawdown of -69.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTVFX and HWMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTVFX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.12% | -69.84% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.95% | -16.87% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.49% | -25.90% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.60% | -63.21% | +14.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.48% | -3.32% | -4.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.02% | -10.89% | +0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 4.15% | -0.48% |
Volatility
FTVFX vs. HWMIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M (FTVFX) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) at 4.30%. This indicates that FTVFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTVFX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 4.30% | +1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.92% | 12.42% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.59% | 23.86% | -2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 22.34% | -1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.12% | 25.62% | -3.50% |