FTVFX vs. FBGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M (FTVFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX).
FTVFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 23, 2003. FBGRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1987.
Performance
FTVFX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTVFX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTVFX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M | 2.88% | 10.74% | 9.80% | 19.10% | -9.60% | 34.39% | 9.19% | 31.01% | -18.21% | 14.69% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | -7.12% | 19.91% | 39.77% | 55.61% | -38.45% | 22.64% | 62.20% | 33.43% | 1.02% | 36.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTVFX achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's -7.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FTVFX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 10.55%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.08% annualized return.
FTVFX
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -6.26%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- 1Y
- 20.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
FBGRX
- 1D
- 4.54%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -7.12%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- 26.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- 19.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTVFX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTVFX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTVFX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank
FTVFX
FBGRX
FTVFX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M (FTVFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTVFX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 1.13 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.73 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.25 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 2.00 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.60 | 7.92 | -2.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTVFX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 1.13 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.47 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.81 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.65 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTVFX and FBGRX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FTVFX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
FTVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.94%, more than FBGRX's 2.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTVFX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M | 7.94% | 8.17% | 12.39% | 0.62% | 0.12% | 4.24% | 0.24% | 2.83% | 14.49% | 2.94% | 0.43% | 1.87% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 2.05% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
Drawdowns
FTVFX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTVFX drawdown since its inception was -67.12%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTVFX and FBGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTVFX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.12% | -58.64% | -8.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.95% | -13.89% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.49% | -43.08% | +18.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.60% | -43.08% | -5.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.48% | -8.68% | +1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.02% | -12.58% | +2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 3.51% | +0.16% |
Volatility
FTVFX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M (FTVFX) is 6.18%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 7.83%. This indicates that FTVFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTVFX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 7.83% | -1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.92% | 14.08% | -2.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.59% | 24.98% | -3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 24.93% | -4.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.12% | 23.63% | -1.51% |