PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTVFX vs. FXNAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTVFX vs. FXNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M (FTVFX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTVFX achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly higher than FXNAX's 0.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FTVFX has outperformed FXNAX with an annualized return of 11.52%, while FXNAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.51% annualized return.


FTVFX

1D
0.29%
1M
3.44%
YTD
16.44%
6M
17.70%
1Y
33.92%
3Y*
18.31%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
11.52%

FXNAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.51%
YTD
0.40%
6M
0.34%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
0.12%
10Y*
1.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTVFX vs. FXNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTVFX
Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M
16.44%10.74%9.80%19.10%-9.60%34.39%9.19%31.01%-18.21%14.69%
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
0.40%7.14%1.35%5.82%-13.55%-2.10%7.63%8.50%0.04%3.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FTVFX and FXNAX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011

-0.14

The correlation between FTVFX and FXNAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTVFX vs. FXNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTVFX
FTVFX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FTVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FTVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FXNAX
FXNAX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FXNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FXNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTVFX vs. FXNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M (FTVFX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTVFXFXNAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.24

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

1.83

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.32

5.61

+7.72

FTVFX vs. FXNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTVFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the FXNAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTVFX and FXNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTVFXFXNAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.36

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.02

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.30

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.45

-0.04

Drawdowns

FTVFX vs. FXNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTVFX drawdown since its inception was -67.12%, which is greater than FXNAX's maximum drawdown of -19.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTVFX and FXNAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTVFXFXNAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.12%

-19.51%

-47.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.97%

-2.94%

-7.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.49%

-6.16%

-18.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.49%

-18.54%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.60%

-19.51%

-29.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.89%

+2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.96%

-3.87%

-6.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

0.96%

+1.75%

Volatility

FTVFX vs. FXNAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M (FTVFX) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) at 1.41%. This indicates that FTVFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTVFXFXNAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

1.41%

+2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.40%

2.82%

+8.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.05%

3.97%

+12.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.48%

6.07%

+14.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.15%

5.01%

+17.14%

FTVFX vs. FXNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTVFX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FXNAX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTVFX vs. FXNAX - Dividend Comparison

FTVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, more than FXNAX's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTVFX
Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class M
7.02%8.17%12.39%0.62%0.12%4.24%0.24%2.83%14.49%2.94%0.43%1.87%
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
3.71%3.58%3.40%3.15%1.81%1.74%2.92%2.68%2.74%2.57%2.76%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTVFX and FXNAX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTVFX has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to FXNAX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTVFX dropped -67.12% vs FXNAX's -19.51%.

FTVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTVFX and FXNAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer