PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTRNX vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTRNX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTRNX achieves a 18.98% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, FTRNX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 19.47%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.


FTRNX

1D
0.94%
1M
9.47%
YTD
18.98%
6M
18.78%
1Y
39.06%
3Y*
31.25%
5Y*
18.03%
10Y*
19.47%

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTRNX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTRNX
Fidelity Trend Fund
18.98%18.77%40.43%44.39%-33.66%22.86%47.01%36.12%-5.48%29.09%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FTRNX and QQQ is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 1999

0.90

The correlation between FTRNX and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTRNX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTRNX
FTRNX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FTRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FTRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTRNX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTRNXQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.45

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

3.51

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.79

13.49

-3.70

FTRNX vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTRNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTRNX and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTRNXQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.64

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.81

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.99

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.41

+0.16

Drawdowns

FTRNX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTRNX drawdown since its inception was -56.26%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRNX and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTRNXQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.26%

-82.97%

+26.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.92%

-11.96%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.97%

-22.77%

-10.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.05%

-35.12%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.05%

-35.12%

-3.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.26%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.55%

-32.79%

+22.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

3.11%

+1.01%

Volatility

FTRNX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that FTRNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTRNXQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.17%

4.49%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.55%

12.10%

+3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.01%

15.94%

+4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.38%

22.38%

+4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.03%

22.29%

+1.74%

FTRNX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTRNX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTRNX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

FTRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTRNX
Fidelity Trend Fund
5.40%8.23%15.26%4.69%5.34%7.80%4.44%9.65%8.30%8.62%5.25%6.44%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FTRNX and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTRNX has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTRNX dropped -56.26% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTRNX and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer