PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTRNX vs. FAMRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTRNX vs. FAMRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTRNX achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly lower than FAMRX's 12.22% return. Over the past 10 years, FTRNX has outperformed FAMRX with an annualized return of 17.81%, while FAMRX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.26% annualized return.


FTRNX

1D
3.03%
1M
-5.87%
6M
6.33%
YTD
6.72%
1Y
15.16%
3Y*
23.30%
5Y*
13.23%
10Y*
17.81%
ALL TIME*
11.37%

FAMRX

1D
2.04%
1M
-0.76%
6M
8.36%
YTD
12.22%
1Y
24.35%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
11.26%
ALL TIME*
7.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FTRNX vs. FAMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTRNX
Fidelity Trend Fund
6.72%18.77%40.43%44.39%-33.66%22.86%47.01%36.12%-5.48%29.09%
FAMRX
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund
12.22%20.87%12.60%18.98%-18.55%17.10%19.37%26.26%-9.21%21.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FTRNX and FAMRX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 1999

0.91

The correlation between FTRNX and FAMRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTRNX vs. FAMRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTRNX
FTRNX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FTRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FTRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FAMRX
FAMRX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FAMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FAMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTRNX vs. FAMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTRNXFAMRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.30

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

2.41

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.67

10.18

-7.52

FTRNX vs. FAMRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTRNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the FAMRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTRNX and FAMRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTRNX vs. FAMRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTRNX drawdown since its inception was -56.26%, roughly equal to the maximum FAMRX drawdown of -58.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRNX and FAMRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTRNXFAMRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.26%

-58.65%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.92%

-9.33%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.97%

-15.35%

-17.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.05%

-26.00%

-13.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.05%

-30.96%

-8.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.37%

-1.82%

-8.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.53%

-12.26%

+1.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

2.21%

+2.44%

Volatility

FTRNX vs. FAMRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX) has a higher volatility of 8.01% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) at 3.95%. This indicates that FTRNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTRNXFAMRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.01%

3.95%

+4.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.67%

11.56%

+7.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.87%

13.69%

+9.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.85%

14.86%

+11.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.25%

15.29%

+8.96%

FTRNX vs. FAMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTRNX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FAMRX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTRNX vs. FAMRX - Dividend Comparison

FTRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, more than FAMRX's 4.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAMRX
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund
4.95%5.56%3.44%1.33%5.07%3.15%1.99%5.52%5.62%2.31%0.28%4.83%
FTRNX
Fidelity Trend Fund
6.02%8.23%15.26%4.69%5.34%7.80%4.44%9.65%8.30%8.62%5.25%6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FTRNX and FAMRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTRNX has higher volatility (8.01%) compared to FAMRX (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTRNX dropped -56.26% vs FAMRX's -58.65%.

FAMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTRNX and FAMRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer