FTRNX vs. PRGSX

In the year-to-date period, FTRNX achieves a -6.86% return, which is significantly lower than PRGSX's 3.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FTRNX has underperformed PRGSX with an annualized return of 7.05%, while PRGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.41% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FTRNX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than PRGSX's 0.82% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX) and T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FTRNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the PRGSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTRNX and PRGSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FTRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, more than PRGSX's 0.07% yield.

The maximum FTRNX drawdown since its inception was -55.96%, smaller than the maximum PRGSX drawdown of -66.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRNX and PRGSX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) at 4.30%. This indicates that FTRNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.