PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTQI vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTQI vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTQI achieves a 14.01% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 18.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FTQI has underperformed FDL with an annualized return of 8.38%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.08% annualized return.


FTQI

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.97%
6M
14.35%
YTD
14.01%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
17.45%
5Y*
12.21%
10Y*
8.38%
ALL TIME*
7.14%

FDL

1D
-0.54%
1M
4.47%
6M
5.75%
YTD
18.60%
1Y
26.71%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
13.96%
10Y*
11.08%
ALL TIME*
8.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$48.97M$49.30M$42.41M
$11.50M$8.69M$6.02M

FTQI vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
14.01%12.68%18.30%23.63%-8.77%10.46%-6.54%13.98%-9.78%12.47%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
18.60%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FTQI and FDL is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014

0.42

The correlation between FTQI and FDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.45 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTQI vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTQI
FDL

Technology

47.4%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
4.4%

Communication Services

8.5%
11.2%

Healthcare

7.6%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
24.3%

Industrials

6.3%
3.6%

Financial Services

5.2%
13.7%

Energy

2.2%
11.1%

Utilities

1.5%
15.4%

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%
0.4%

Technology

FTQI
47.4%
FDL
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FTQI
11.6%
FDL
4.4%

Communication Services

FTQI
8.5%
FDL
11.2%

Healthcare

FTQI
7.6%
FDL
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

FTQI
7.4%
FDL
24.3%

Industrials

FTQI
6.3%
FDL
3.6%

Financial Services

FTQI
5.2%
FDL
13.7%

Energy

FTQI
2.2%
FDL
11.1%

Utilities

FTQI
1.5%
FDL
15.4%

Real Estate

FTQI
1.1%
FDL

-

Basic Materials

FTQI
1.1%
FDL
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTQI vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTQI
FTQI Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FTQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQI Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQI Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTQI vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTQIFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.39

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

6.28

-2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.34

14.78

+3.56

FTQI vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTQI Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTQI and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTQI vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTQI drawdown since its inception was -19.42%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTQI and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTQIFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.42%

-65.93%

+46.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.24%

-4.27%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.42%

-12.24%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.42%

-16.46%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.42%

-41.40%

+21.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-1.60%

+1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-9.59%

+5.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

1.81%

-0.43%

Volatility

FTQI vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) is 3.82%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that FTQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTQIFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

4.48%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

8.63%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.24%

11.88%

-0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.80%

14.43%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.94%

17.16%

-4.22%

FTQI vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTQI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTQI vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

FTQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.03%, more than FDL's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.58%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
11.03%11.46%11.66%11.49%9.85%3.05%3.27%2.95%3.27%2.74%3.02%3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTQI and FDL have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to FTQI (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTQI dropped -19.42% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, FDL leads with 11.08% vs 8.38% for FTQI. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FTQI has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDL has performed better with a 11.08% return vs 8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTQI.

FTQI has the higher dividend yield at 11.03%, compared with 3.58% for FDL.

FTQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. FTQI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FTQI and 0.43% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTQI and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer