PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTQI vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTQI vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTQI achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 12.30% return. Over the past 10 years, FTQI has underperformed FDL with an annualized return of 8.16%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.09% annualized return.


FTQI

1D
0.00%
1M
1.53%
YTD
10.72%
6M
9.99%
1Y
26.22%
3Y*
16.88%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
8.16%

FDL

1D
-0.32%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
12.30%
6M
12.10%
1Y
21.91%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.94%
10Y*
11.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTQI vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
10.72%12.68%18.30%23.63%-8.77%10.46%-6.54%13.98%-9.78%12.47%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
12.30%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FTQI and FDL is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between FTQI and FDL has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FTQI vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTQI
FDL

Technology

49.4%
1.4%

Communication Services

11.8%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
14.4%

Healthcare

6.0%
17.6%

Financial Services

5.5%
15.2%

Industrials

4.1%
3.9%

Energy

2.3%
25.7%

Utilities

1.5%
6.5%

Basic Materials

1.4%
0.3%

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Technology

FTQI
49.4%
FDL
1.4%

Communication Services

FTQI
11.8%
FDL
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FTQI
10.5%
FDL
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

FTQI
6.2%
FDL
14.4%

Healthcare

FTQI
6.0%
FDL
17.6%

Financial Services

FTQI
5.5%
FDL
15.2%

Industrials

FTQI
4.1%
FDL
3.9%

Energy

FTQI
2.3%
FDL
25.7%

Utilities

FTQI
1.5%
FDL
6.5%

Basic Materials

FTQI
1.4%
FDL
0.3%

Real Estate

FTQI
1.3%
FDL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTQI vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTQI
FTQI Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FTQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQI Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQI Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTQI vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTQIFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.33

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

5.15

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.11

12.05

+8.06

FTQI vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTQI Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTQI and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTQI vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTQI drawdown since its inception was -19.42%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTQI and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTQIFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.42%

-65.93%

+46.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.24%

-4.27%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.42%

-12.24%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.42%

-16.46%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.42%

-41.40%

+21.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-3.40%

+2.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-9.63%

+5.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

1.82%

-0.51%

Volatility

FTQI vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) is 3.26%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that FTQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTQIFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

3.54%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.52%

8.10%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.64%

11.55%

-0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.83%

14.31%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.33%

17.11%

-3.78%

FTQI vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTQI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTQI vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

FTQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.97%, more than FDL's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.71%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
10.97%11.46%11.66%11.49%9.85%3.05%3.27%2.95%3.27%2.74%3.02%3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTQI and FDL have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to FTQI (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTQI dropped -19.42% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, FDL leads with 11.09% vs 8.16% for FTQI. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FTQI has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDL has performed better with a 11.09% return vs 8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTQI.

FTQI has the higher dividend yield at 10.97%, compared with 3.71% for FDL.

FTQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. FTQI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FTQI and 0.43% for FDL.

FTQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTQI and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer