FTOH vs. VTES
FTOH (Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF) and VTES (Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares) are both Municipal Bonds funds - FTOH tracks the Actively Managed while VTES tracks the S&P 0-7 Yr National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTOH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VTES.
Performance
FTOH vs. VTES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTOH achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly higher than VTES's 0.71% return.
FTOH
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 2.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTES
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 3.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTOH vs. VTES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTOH Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF | 2.25% | 0.20% |
VTES Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares | 0.71% | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTOH and VTES is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTOH vs. VTES — Risk / Return Rank
FTOH
VTES
FTOH vs. VTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF (FTOH) and Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares (VTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTOH | VTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.22 | 1.82 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
FTOH vs. VTES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTOH drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, which is greater than VTES's maximum drawdown of -2.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTOH and VTES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTOH | VTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -2.42% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.57% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.57% | -0.50% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.50% | — |
Volatility
FTOH vs. VTES - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTOH | VTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.64% | 1.24% | +2.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.64% | 1.72% | +1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.64% | 1.72% | +1.92% |
FTOH vs. VTES - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTOH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VTES's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTOH vs. VTES - Dividend Comparison
FTOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than VTES's 2.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTOH Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF | 2.18% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTES Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.99% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTOH and VTES have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTES is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTES is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTOH.
VTES has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 2.18% for FTOH.
FTOH tracks Actively Managed, while VTES tracks S&P 0-7 Yr National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTOH and 0.07% for VTES.
Find the right allocation for FTOH and VTES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer