FTOH vs. IBIC

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FTOH (Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTOH is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Actively Managed, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. FTOH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

FTOH vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF (FTOH) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTOH achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.33% return.

FTOH

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 2.61%
• 6M: 2.61%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIC

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 2.33%
• 6M: 2.35%
• 1Y: 4.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTOH vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTOH Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF	2.61%	0.08%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	2.33%	0.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FTOH and IBIC is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025	-0.17

Return for Risk

FTOH vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTOH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTOH vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF (FTOH) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTOH	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	4.95	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	8.87	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	2.21	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	16.49	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	57.80	—

Drawdowns

FTOH vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTOH drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTOH and IBIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTOH	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.59%	-0.90%	-1.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.17%	+0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.53%	-0.10%	-0.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTOH	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.19%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.67%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.56%	0.90%	+2.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.56%	1.56%	+2.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.56%	1.56%	+2.00%

FTOH vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTOH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTOH vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

FTOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FTOH Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF	2.17%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	3.59%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTOH and IBIC in my portfolio?

FTOH and IBIC have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTOH or IBIC?

On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTOH or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTOH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTOH or IBIC?

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 2.17% for FTOH.

What is the main difference between FTOH and IBIC?

FTOH is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. FTOH tracks Actively Managed, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTOH and 0.10% for IBIC.