FTOH vs. DIVI
FTOH (Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF) and DIVI (Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTOH is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Actively Managed, while DIVI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. FTOH is passively managed, while DIVI is actively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTOH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for DIVI.
Performance
FTOH vs. DIVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTOH achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly lower than DIVI's 11.66% return.
FTOH
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 2.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIVI
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 11.66%
- 6M
- 14.03%
- 1Y
- 27.26%
- 3Y*
- 18.67%
- 5Y*
- 13.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
FTOH vs. DIVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTOH Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF | 2.25% | 0.20% |
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 11.66% | 3.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTOH and DIVI is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTOH vs. DIVI — Risk / Return Rank
FTOH
DIVI
FTOH vs. DIVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF (FTOH) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTOH | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.22 | 0.67 | +0.55 |
Drawdowns
FTOH vs. DIVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTOH drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum DIVI drawdown of -27.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTOH and DIVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTOH | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -27.76% | +25.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.32% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.57% | -3.63% | +3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.73% | — |
Volatility
FTOH vs. DIVI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTOH | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.64% | 14.83% | -11.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.64% | 15.29% | -11.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.64% | 16.46% | -12.82% |
FTOH vs. DIVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTOH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVI's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTOH vs. DIVI - Dividend Comparison
FTOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than DIVI's 3.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 3.51% | 3.76% | 4.39% | 3.17% | 6.03% | 2.77% | 8.04% | 1.61% | 5.67% | 5.22% | 11.56% |
FTOH Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF | 2.18% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTOH and DIVI have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DIVI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DIVI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTOH.
DIVI has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 2.18% for FTOH.
FTOH is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DIVI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTOH and 0.09% for DIVI.
Find the right allocation for FTOH and DIVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer