PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTLTX vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTLTX vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FTLTX) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTLTX achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.27% return.


FTLTX

1D
0.19%
1M
1.11%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
-1.19%
1Y
5.75%
3Y*
-0.49%
5Y*
-5.06%
10Y*

TLT

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.81%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
-1.80%
5Y*
-6.31%
10Y*
-1.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTLTX vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTLTX
Fidelity Series Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
-0.06%5.45%-6.13%3.27%-29.89%-5.13%17.45%14.23%-1.63%8.22%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.27%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-31.23%-4.60%18.15%14.12%-1.61%8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FTLTX and TLT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.99

The correlation between FTLTX and TLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTLTX vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTLTX
FTLTX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FTLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTLTX vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FTLTX) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTLTXTLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.09

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

0.65

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.04

1.63

+0.41

FTLTX vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTLTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is comparable to the TLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTLTX and TLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTLTXTLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

0.51

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.35

-0.40

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.26

-0.28

Drawdowns

FTLTX vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTLTX drawdown since its inception was -46.86%, roughly equal to the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLTX and TLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTLTXTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.86%

-48.35%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.10%

-7.58%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.72%

-19.18%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.52%

-43.70%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.09%

-40.44%

+3.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.99%

-13.82%

-6.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

3.04%

-0.31%

Volatility

FTLTX vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FTLTX) is 2.57%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.76%. This indicates that FTLTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTLTXTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

2.76%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.08%

6.50%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.01%

9.77%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.59%

15.87%

-1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.87%

14.91%

-1.04%

FTLTX vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTLTX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FTLTX vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

FTLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than TLT's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTLTX
Fidelity Series Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.94%3.83%3.71%3.17%2.20%2.06%12.95%10.68%2.89%2.44%0.00%0.00%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.59%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FTLTX and TLT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TLT has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to FTLTX (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTLTX dropped -46.86% vs TLT's -48.35%.

FTLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTLTX and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer