FTLTX vs. DFFGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FTLTX) and DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio (DFFGX).
FTLTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 7, 2016. DFFGX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on May 31, 1987.
Performance
FTLTX vs. DFFGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTLTX vs. DFFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTLTX Fidelity Series Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | -0.50% | 5.45% | -6.13% | 3.27% | -29.89% | -5.13% | 17.45% | 14.23% | -1.63% | 8.22% |
DFFGX DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio | 0.87% | 3.12% | 5.29% | 5.01% | -4.41% | -1.27% | 0.39% | 2.52% | 1.17% | 0.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTLTX achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than DFFGX's 0.87% return.
FTLTX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -3.44%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- -1.02%
- 1Y
- -0.72%
- 3Y*
- -1.60%
- 5Y*
- -5.02%
- 10Y*
- —
DFFGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 2.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.36%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 1.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTLTX vs. DFFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTLTX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than DFFGX's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FTLTX vs. DFFGX — Risk / Return Rank
FTLTX
DFFGX
FTLTX vs. DFFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FTLTX) and DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio (DFFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTLTX | DFFGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | 2.60 | -2.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.07 | 2.99 | -2.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 3.97 | -2.96 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | 3.09 | -2.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.32 | 9.14 | -8.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTLTX | DFFGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 | 2.60 | -2.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | 0.98 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.49 | -0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTLTX and DFFGX is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FTLTX vs. DFFGX - Dividend Comparison
FTLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than DFFGX's 2.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTLTX Fidelity Series Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 3.56% | 3.83% | 3.71% | 3.17% | 2.20% | 2.06% | 12.95% | 10.68% | 2.89% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DFFGX DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio | 2.86% | 2.98% | 4.87% | 3.57% | 1.85% | 0.15% | 0.29% | 1.83% | 1.53% | 1.18% | 0.99% | 1.27% |
Drawdowns
FTLTX vs. DFFGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTLTX drawdown since its inception was -46.86%, which is greater than DFFGX's maximum drawdown of -10.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLTX and DFFGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTLTX | DFFGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.86% | -10.09% | -36.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.76% | -1.00% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.52% | -6.49% | -35.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -6.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.37% | 0.00% | -37.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.66% | -0.86% | -18.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 0.34% | +3.60% |
Volatility
FTLTX vs. DFFGX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Series Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FTLTX) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio (DFFGX) at 0.15%. This indicates that FTLTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTLTX | DFFGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.62% | 0.15% | +3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.12% | 0.40% | +5.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.59% | 1.42% | +9.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 1.85% | +12.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.96% | 1.57% | +12.39% |