PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTLS vs. XITK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTLS vs. XITK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) and SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTLS achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than XITK's 18.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FTLS has underperformed XITK with an annualized return of 9.81%, while XITK has yielded a comparatively higher 14.76% annualized return.


FTLS

1D
0.67%
1M
1.31%
YTD
5.21%
6M
4.51%
1Y
14.78%
3Y*
14.27%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
9.81%

XITK

1D
-0.13%
1M
17.59%
YTD
18.12%
6M
19.40%
1Y
17.12%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
0.64%
10Y*
14.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTLS vs. XITK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
5.21%9.09%18.80%16.94%-5.56%19.65%2.56%16.16%-4.81%14.41%
XITK
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
18.12%2.53%19.12%45.87%-47.45%-11.24%90.22%36.98%7.60%36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FTLS and XITK is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2016

0.59

The correlation between FTLS and XITK shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.60 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTLS vs. XITK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTLS
XITK

Technology

26.9%
83.4%

Financial Services

19.9%
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
2.2%

Healthcare

8.4%
1.6%

Industrials

7.6%
2.0%

Energy

7.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.5%

-

Communication Services

6.1%
8.6%

Basic Materials

5.1%

-

Real Estate

1.9%
0.5%

Utilities

0.9%

-

Technology

FTLS
26.9%
XITK
83.4%

Financial Services

FTLS
19.9%
XITK
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FTLS
9.5%
XITK
2.2%

Healthcare

FTLS
8.4%
XITK
1.6%

Industrials

FTLS
7.6%
XITK
2.0%

Energy

FTLS
7.3%
XITK

-

Consumer Defensive

FTLS
6.5%
XITK

-

Communication Services

FTLS
6.1%
XITK
8.6%

Basic Materials

FTLS
5.1%
XITK

-

Real Estate

FTLS
1.9%
XITK
0.5%

Utilities

FTLS
0.9%
XITK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTLS vs. XITK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTLS
FTLS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FTLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

XITK
XITK Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XITK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XITK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
XITK Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XITK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XITK Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTLS vs. XITK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) and SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTLSXITKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

0.65

+1.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.64

1.07

+1.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.13

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

0.62

+3.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.34

1.45

+10.89

FTLS vs. XITK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the XITK Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTLS and XITK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTLSXITKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

0.65

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.02

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

0.50

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.53

+0.28

Drawdowns

FTLS vs. XITK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTLS drawdown since its inception was -20.54%, smaller than the maximum XITK drawdown of -65.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLS and XITK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTLSXITKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.54%

-65.56%

+45.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.79%

-28.03%

+24.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.69%

-28.18%

+16.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.69%

-61.53%

+49.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.54%

-65.56%

+45.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-19.46%

+19.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-22.08%

+19.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

11.96%

-10.75%

Volatility

FTLS vs. XITK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) is 1.93%, while SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that FTLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XITK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTLSXITKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

7.42%

-5.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.65%

21.56%

-15.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.19%

26.26%

-18.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.55%

32.61%

-22.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.30%

29.55%

-18.25%

FTLS vs. XITK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTLS has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XITK's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTLS vs. XITK - Dividend Comparison

FTLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while XITK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
0.90%1.07%1.50%1.49%0.81%0.01%0.44%0.83%0.87%0.43%1.04%0.49%
XITK
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.11%0.00%0.06%0.14%1.50%1.74%1.88%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTLS and XITK have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XITK has higher volatility (7.42%) compared to FTLS (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTLS dropped -20.54% vs XITK's -65.56%.

On 10-year performance, XITK leads with 14.76% vs 9.81% for FTLS. On fees, XITK is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FTLS has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XITK has performed better with a 14.76% return vs 9.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XITK is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.60% for FTLS.

FTLS has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for XITK.

FTLS is categorized as Long-Short, while XITK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.60% for FTLS and 0.45% for XITK.

FTLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTLS and XITK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer