PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTLF vs. FRHC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FTLF vs. FRHC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) and Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTLF achieves a -32.33% return, which is significantly lower than FRHC's 13.58% return.


FTLF

1D
-4.92%
1M
15.53%
YTD
-32.33%
6M
-38.73%
1Y
-22.90%
3Y*
11.70%
5Y*
18.62%
10Y*
50.47%

FRHC

1D
-1.56%
1M
-2.60%
YTD
13.58%
6M
1.05%
1Y
-9.27%
3Y*
18.18%
5Y*
18.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTLF vs. FRHC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTLF
FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock
-32.33%-0.18%70.68%19.75%-0.31%196.30%53.19%3,182.89%78.96%-25.00%
FRHC
Freedom Holding Corp.
13.58%-6.89%62.15%38.44%-16.02%35.12%252.89%76.03%29.87%236.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FTLF and FRHC is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2017

0.04

Fundamentals

EPS

FTLF:

$0.68

FRHC:

$0.04

PE Ratio

FTLF:

16.26

FRHC:

3.17K

PEG Ratio

FTLF:

1.79

FRHC:

278.17

PS Ratio

FTLF:

1.56

FRHC:

3.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

FTLF:

$70.56M

FRHC:

$2.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FTLF:

$28.73M

FRHC:

$1.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

FTLF:

$11.02M

FRHC:

$542.59M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTLF vs. FRHC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTLF
FTLF Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FTLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLF Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLF Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FRHC
FRHC Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FRHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRHC Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FRHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRHC Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTLF vs. FRHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) and Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTLFFRHCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.99

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.40

-0.23

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.81

-0.40

-0.41

FTLF vs. FRHC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTLF Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the FRHC Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTLF and FRHC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTLF vs. FRHC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTLF drawdown since its inception was -99.68%, which is greater than FRHC's maximum drawdown of -45.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLF and FRHC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTLFFRHCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.68%

-45.93%

-53.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.23%

-41.08%

-16.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.23%

-41.08%

-16.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.23%

-45.93%

-11.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.97%

-27.32%

-19.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.89%

-11.70%

-59.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.39%

23.29%

+5.10%

Volatility

FTLF vs. FRHC - Volatility Comparison

FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) has a higher volatility of 19.36% compared to Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC) at 13.08%. This indicates that FTLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTLFFRHCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.36%

13.08%

+6.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.63%

28.16%

+9.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.03%

38.90%

+13.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.37%

37.95%

+7.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

305.80%

47.72%

+258.08%

Dividends

FTLF vs. FRHC - Dividend Comparison

Neither FTLF nor FRHC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

FTLF vs. FRHC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock and Freedom Holding Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
23.49M
615.57M
(FTLF) Total Revenue
(FRHC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FTLF and FRHC have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTLF has higher volatility (19.36%) compared to FRHC (13.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTLF dropped -99.68% vs FRHC's -45.93%.

FRHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTLF and FRHC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer