PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRHC vs. HLNE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FRHC vs. HLNE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC) and Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRHC achieves a 29.72% return, which is significantly higher than HLNE's -36.48% return.


FRHC

1D
4.90%
1M
16.82%
YTD
29.72%
6M
18.80%
1Y
-1.71%
3Y*
24.64%
5Y*
24.48%
10Y*

HLNE

1D
-4.00%
1M
-8.32%
YTD
-36.48%
6M
-29.29%
1Y
-42.06%
3Y*
7.52%
5Y*
1.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRHC vs. HLNE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRHC
Freedom Holding Corp.
29.72%-6.89%62.15%38.44%-16.02%35.12%252.89%76.03%29.87%227.84%
HLNE
Hamilton Lane Incorporated
-36.48%-7.90%32.40%81.36%-36.98%34.74%33.55%64.25%6.61%29.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FRHC and HLNE is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2017

0.32

The correlation between FRHC and HLNE shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

FRHC:

$0.04

HLNE:

$4.29

PE Ratio

FRHC:

3.62K

HLNE:

19.80

PEG Ratio

FRHC:

317.70

HLNE:

1.46

PS Ratio

FRHC:

4.56

HLNE:

6.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

FRHC:

$2.12B

HLNE:

$763.40M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FRHC:

$1.05B

HLNE:

$528.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

FRHC:

$542.59M

HLNE:

$446.22M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRHC vs. HLNE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRHC
FRHC Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FRHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRHC Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FRHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRHC Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

HLNE
HLNE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
HLNE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLNE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLNE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
HLNE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLNE Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRHC vs. HLNE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC) and Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRHCHLNEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.04

-1.10

+1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.21

-1.61

+1.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.82

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

-0.89

+0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.21

-1.72

+1.51

FRHC vs. HLNE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRHC Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is higher than the HLNE Sharpe Ratio of -1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRHC and HLNE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRHCHLNEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

-1.10

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.04

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.39

0.56

+0.83

Drawdowns

FRHC vs. HLNE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRHC drawdown since its inception was -45.93%, smaller than the maximum HLNE drawdown of -57.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRHC and HLNE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRHCHLNEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.93%

-57.30%

+11.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.08%

-47.04%

+5.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.08%

-57.30%

+16.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.93%

-57.30%

+11.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.99%

-56.92%

+39.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.67%

-15.94%

+4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.06%

24.47%

-1.41%

Volatility

FRHC vs. HLNE - Volatility Comparison

Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC) and Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) have volatilities of 10.52% and 10.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRHCHLNEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.52%

10.55%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.05%

30.64%

-3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.82%

38.19%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.87%

35.99%

+1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.71%

36.39%

+11.32%

Dividends

FRHC vs. HLNE - Dividend Comparison

FRHC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HLNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRHC
Freedom Holding Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HLNE
Hamilton Lane Incorporated
2.55%1.57%1.29%1.53%2.43%1.31%1.55%1.74%2.20%1.48%

Financials

FRHC vs. HLNE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Freedom Holding Corp. and Hamilton Lane Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
615.57M
198.59M
(FRHC) Total Revenue
(HLNE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FRHC vs. HLNE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Freedom Holding Corp. and Hamilton Lane Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
57.6%
69.3%
Portfolio components
FRHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freedom Holding Corp. reported a gross profit of 354.51M and revenue of 615.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.

HLNE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hamilton Lane Incorporated reported a gross profit of 137.70M and revenue of 198.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.3%.

FRHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freedom Holding Corp. reported an operating income of 199.99M and revenue of 615.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.5%.

HLNE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hamilton Lane Incorporated reported an operating income of 86.01M and revenue of 198.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 43.3%.

FRHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freedom Holding Corp. reported a net income of 76.24M and revenue of 615.57M, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.

HLNE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hamilton Lane Incorporated reported a net income of 58.37M and revenue of 198.59M, resulting in a net margin of 29.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FRHC and HLNE have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HLNE has higher volatility (10.55%) compared to FRHC (10.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRHC dropped -45.93% vs HLNE's -57.30%.

FRHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRHC and HLNE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer