FTIHX vs. FCNVX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FTIHX (Fidelity Total International Index Fund) and FCNVX (Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class) are both mutual funds - FTIHX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI (All Country World Index) ex USA Investable Market Index, while FCNVX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FTIHX returned 10.24%/yr vs 2.57%/yr for FCNVX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTIHX charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FCNVX.

Performance

FTIHX vs. FCNVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTIHX achieves a 15.70% return, which is significantly higher than FCNVX's 1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FTIHX has outperformed FCNVX with an annualized return of 10.24%, while FCNVX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.57% annualized return.

FTIHX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 3.19%
• YTD: 15.70%
• 6M: 15.70%
• 1Y: 33.01%
• 3Y*: 20.01%
• 5Y*: 9.03%
• 10Y*: 10.24%

FCNVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 4.03%
• 3Y*: 5.00%
• 5Y*: 3.58%
• 10Y*: 2.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTIHX vs. FCNVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTIHX Fidelity Total International Index Fund	15.70%	32.59%	4.98%	15.49%	-16.29%	8.45%	11.09%	21.50%	-14.40%	25.88%
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class	1.40%	4.51%	5.43%	5.86%	0.85%	-0.06%	1.10%	3.00%	1.82%	1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FTIHX and FCNVX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2016	0.02

Return for Risk

FTIHX vs. FCNVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTIHX

FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

FCNVX

FCNVX Risk / Return Rank: 99
FCNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FCNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTIHX vs. FCNVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTIHX	FCNVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	3.44	-1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	22.92	-19.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	13.46	-12.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	40.73	-37.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.71	139.01	-127.30

FTIHX vs. FCNVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTIHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is lower than the FCNVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTIHX and FCNVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTIHX vs. FCNVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTIHX drawdown since its inception was -35.75%, which is greater than FCNVX's maximum drawdown of -2.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTIHX and FCNVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTIHX	FCNVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.75%	-2.19%	-33.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.25%	-0.10%	-11.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.15%	-0.30%	-12.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.99%	-0.59%	-29.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.75%	-2.19%	-33.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.10%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.19%	-0.05%	-7.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	0.03%	+2.87%

Volatility

FTIHX vs. FCNVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) at 0.35%. This indicates that FTIHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTIHX	FCNVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.22%	0.35%	+5.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.22%	0.79%	+12.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.25%	1.18%	+14.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.46%	1.29%	+14.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.09%	1.04%	+15.05%

FTIHX vs. FCNVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTIHX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNVX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FTIHX vs. FCNVX - Dividend Comparison

FTIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than FCNVX's 4.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class	4.15%	4.41%	5.17%	4.97%	1.24%	0.24%	0.99%	2.45%	2.21%	1.30%	1.01%	0.48%
FTIHX Fidelity Total International Index Fund	2.41%	2.78%	2.88%	2.78%	2.51%	2.55%	1.62%	2.61%	2.21%	0.45%	0.47%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTIHX and FCNVX in my portfolio?

FTIHX and FCNVX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTIHX or FCNVX?

FTIHX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to FCNVX (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTIHX dropped -35.75% vs FCNVX's -2.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCNVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.