PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTIHX vs. FSGGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTIHX vs. FSGGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) and Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FTIHX having a 12.47% return and FSGGX slightly higher at 13.02%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FTIHX having a 9.93% annualized return and FSGGX not far behind at 9.79%.


FTIHX

1D
-2.79%
1M
0.31%
YTD
12.47%
6M
12.47%
1Y
27.40%
3Y*
18.89%
5Y*
8.26%
10Y*
9.93%

FSGGX

1D
-2.90%
1M
0.72%
YTD
13.02%
6M
13.02%
1Y
28.20%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
9.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTIHX vs. FSGGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
12.47%32.59%4.98%15.49%-16.29%8.45%11.09%21.50%-14.40%25.88%
FSGGX
Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund
13.02%32.93%5.30%15.57%-15.75%7.74%10.73%21.36%-13.93%24.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FTIHX and FSGGX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2016

0.99

The correlation between FTIHX and FSGGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTIHX vs. FSGGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTIHX
FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FSGGX
FSGGX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FSGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FSGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTIHX vs. FSGGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) and Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTIHXFSGGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.36

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.69

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.11

10.34

-0.23

FTIHX vs. FSGGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTIHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the FSGGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTIHX and FSGGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTIHX vs. FSGGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTIHX drawdown since its inception was -35.75%, roughly equal to the maximum FSGGX drawdown of -34.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTIHX and FSGGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTIHXFSGGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.75%

-34.76%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.25%

-11.26%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-13.31%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.99%

-29.53%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.75%

-34.76%

-0.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

-2.90%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.19%

-7.32%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.92%

-0.02%

Volatility

FTIHX vs. FSGGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) and Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) have volatilities of 6.87% and 7.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTIHXFSGGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.87%

7.14%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.54%

13.88%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.50%

15.83%

-0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.51%

15.62%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.96%

16.09%

-0.13%

FTIHX vs. FSGGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTIHX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FSGGX's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FTIHX vs. FSGGX - Dividend Comparison

FTIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than FSGGX's 2.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSGGX
Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund
2.39%2.70%2.91%2.95%2.64%2.60%1.71%2.85%2.66%0.22%0.05%2.44%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
2.47%2.78%2.88%2.78%2.51%2.55%1.62%2.61%2.21%0.45%0.47%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FTIHX and FSGGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSGGX has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to FTIHX (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTIHX dropped -35.75% vs FSGGX's -34.76%.

FSGGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTIHX and FSGGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer