FTI vs. VRT
FTI (TechnipFMC plc) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. FTI operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, FTI returned 50.06%/yr vs 66.54%/yr for VRT. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FTI vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTI achieves a 46.47% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 105.66% return.
FTI
- 1D
- -2.75%
- 1M
- -8.20%
- YTD
- 46.47%
- 6M
- 45.94%
- 1Y
- 86.16%
- 3Y*
- 65.31%
- 5Y*
- 50.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
VRT
- 1D
- 4.87%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 105.66%
- 6M
- 108.48%
- 1Y
- 181.27%
- 3Y*
- 145.68%
- 5Y*
- 66.54%
- 10Y*
- —
FTI vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTI TechnipFMC plc | 46.47% | 54.90% | 44.78% | 66.07% | 105.91% | -15.36% | -55.23% | 12.09% | -39.13% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 105.66% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 33.80% | 69.36% | 12.55% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTI and VRT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018 | 0.22 |
The correlation between FTI and VRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FTI:
$26.71B
VRT:
$130.60B
FTI:
$2.59
VRT:
$3.99
FTI:
25.17
VRT:
83.56
FTI:
0.03
VRT:
0.37
FTI:
2.67
VRT:
12.01
FTI:
7.94
VRT:
30.77
FTI:
$10.19B
VRT:
$10.84B
FTI:
$2.75B
VRT:
$3.92B
FTI:
$1.13B
VRT:
$2.35B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTI vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
FTI
VRT
FTI vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTI | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.43 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.60 | 7.16 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.87 | 18.97 | -2.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTI vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTI drawdown since its inception was -91.74%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTI and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTI | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.74% | -71.24% | -20.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.29% | -25.32% | +10.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.94% | -61.28% | +32.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.32% | -71.24% | +29.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.29% | -11.46% | -3.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.90% | -16.23% | -17.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.08% | 9.53% | -4.45% |
Volatility
FTI vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is 9.82%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 15.84%. This indicates that FTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTI | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.82% | 15.84% | -6.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.99% | 45.28% | -23.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.91% | 58.58% | -26.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.42% | 62.01% | -19.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.72% | 54.65% | -6.93% |
Dividends
FTI vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
FTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, more than VRT's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTI TechnipFMC plc | 0.31% | 0.45% | 0.69% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.38% | 2.43% | 2.66% | 0.42% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.07% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FTI vs. VRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TechnipFMC plc and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FTI vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison
FTI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a gross profit of 1.49B and revenue of 2.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.7%.
VRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
FTI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported an operating income of 351.00M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.
VRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.
FTI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a net income of 260.50M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
VRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FTI and VRT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRT has higher volatility (15.84%) compared to FTI (9.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTI dropped -91.74% vs VRT's -71.24%.
VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTI and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer