FTI vs. SEI
FTI (TechnipFMC plc) and SEI (Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 5 years, FTI returned 58.89%/yr vs 47.96%/yr for SEI. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FTI vs. SEI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTI achieves a 61.05% return, which is significantly higher than SEI's 12.30% return.
FTI
- 1D
- 3.98%
- 1M
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 28.80%
- YTD
- 61.05%
- 1Y
- 97.83%
- 3Y*
- 59.85%
- 5Y*
- 58.89%
- 10Y*
- 15.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.78%
SEI
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -29.98%
- 6M
- -6.46%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 1Y
- 58.96%
- 3Y*
- 73.99%
- 5Y*
- 47.96%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $254.67M | $262.31M | $331.74M | |
| $200.05M | $228.81M | $190.63M |
FTI vs. SEI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTI TechnipFMC plc | 61.05% | 54.90% | 44.78% | 66.07% | 105.91% | -15.36% | -55.23% | 12.09% | -36.32% | -0.21% |
SEI Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc | 12.30% | 62.29% | 277.66% | -15.75% | 57.46% | -15.55% | -38.09% | 19.10% | -43.06% | 75.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTI and SEI is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2017 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FTI and SEI has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
FTI:
$28.57B
SEI:
$3.15B
FTI:
$2.86
SEI:
$0.97
FTI:
25.03
SEI:
52.86
FTI:
2.83
SEI:
3.54
FTI:
8.91
SEI:
3.26
FTI:
$10.40B
SEI:
$692.11M
FTI:
$3.10B
SEI:
$235.28M
FTI:
$1.86B
SEI:
$249.65M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTI vs. SEI — Risk / Return Rank
FTI
SEI
FTI vs. SEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTI | SEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.18 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.98 | 1.24 | +4.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.23 | 4.72 | +12.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTI vs. SEI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTI drawdown since its inception was -91.74%, which is greater than SEI's maximum drawdown of -79.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTI and SEI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTI | SEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.74% | -79.49% | -12.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -47.61% | +31.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.94% | -55.37% | +26.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.71% | -55.37% | +18.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.86% | -37.97% | +31.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.78% | -38.32% | +4.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.74% | 12.78% | -7.04% |
Volatility
FTI vs. SEI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is 10.26%, while Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) has a volatility of 30.50%. This indicates that FTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTI | SEI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.26% | 30.50% | -20.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.71% | 57.43% | -33.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.03% | 77.63% | -46.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.90% | 68.06% | -26.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.67% | 62.88% | -15.21% |
Dividends
FTI vs. SEI - Dividend Comparison
FTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than SEI's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTI TechnipFMC plc | 0.28% | 0.45% | 0.69% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.38% | 2.43% | 2.66% | 0.42% |
SEI Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.67% | 5.65% | 4.23% | 6.41% | 5.16% | 2.89% | 0.83% | 0.00% |
Financials
FTI vs. SEI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TechnipFMC plc and Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FTI vs. SEI - Profitability Comparison
FTI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a gross profit of 1.40B and revenue of 2.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.6%.
SEI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported a gross profit of 72.72M and revenue of 196.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.
FTI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported an operating income of 484.70M and revenue of 2.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.5%.
SEI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported an operating income of 50.56M and revenue of 196.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.8%.
FTI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TechnipFMC plc reported a net income of 362.70M and revenue of 2.76B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.
SEI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported a net income of 21.44M and revenue of 196.24M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FTI and SEI have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEI has higher volatility (30.50%) compared to FTI (10.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTI dropped -91.74% vs SEI's -79.49%.
FTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTI and SEI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer