FTHI vs. FDL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTHI (First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FTHI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by First Trust, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. FTHI is actively managed, while FDL is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTHI returned 8.54%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for FDL. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTHI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDL.

Performance

FTHI vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF (FTHI) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTHI achieves a 4.79% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 13.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FTHI has underperformed FDL with an annualized return of 8.54%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.24% annualized return.

FTHI

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.75%
• YTD: 4.79%
• 6M: 5.22%
• 1Y: 16.43%
• 3Y*: 14.50%
• 5Y*: 10.17%
• 10Y*: 8.54%

FDL

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.26%
• YTD: 13.33%
• 6M: 14.76%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: 18.97%
• 5Y*: 12.51%
• 10Y*: 11.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTHI vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTHI First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF	4.79%	11.03%	19.02%	20.72%	-4.37%	13.95%	-7.13%	18.16%	-9.72%	14.41%
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	13.33%	14.79%	17.98%	2.94%	6.66%	26.10%	-4.30%	24.41%	-5.99%	12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FTHI and FDL is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2014	0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between FTHI and FDL has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FTHI vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTHI	FDL
Financial Services	15.4%	15.1%
Industrials	13.9%	3.8%
Technology	11.4%	1.1%
Utilities	10.0%	6.5%
Healthcare	8.5%	16.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	3.8%
Consumer Defensive	7.5%	14.7%
Energy	7.0%	27.3%
Real Estate	7.0%	-
Basic Materials	5.0%	0.3%
Communication Services	5.0%	10.6%

Return for Risk

FTHI vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTHI

FTHI Risk / Return Rank: 59
FTHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
FTHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FTHI Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FTHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FTHI Martin Ratio Rank: 70

FDL

FDL Risk / Return Rank: 70
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTHI vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF (FTHI) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTHI	FDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	2.11	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	3.25	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.37	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	5.56	-2.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.19	13.56	-0.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTHI vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTHI Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTHI and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTHI	FDL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87	2.11	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.88	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.66	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.45	+0.08

Drawdowns

FTHI vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTHI drawdown since its inception was -32.65%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHI and FDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTHI	FDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.65%	-65.93%	+33.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.47%	-4.27%	-1.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.92%	-12.24%	-3.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.70%	-16.46%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.65%	-41.40%	+8.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-2.18%	+2.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.68%	-9.66%	+5.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.25%	1.75%	-0.50%

Volatility

FTHI vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF (FTHI) is 1.67%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that FTHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTHI	FDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.67%	2.85%	-1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.05%	7.87%	-0.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.81%	11.28%	-2.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.44%	14.31%	-0.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.33%	17.11%	-2.78%

FTHI vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTHI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTHI vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

FTHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.73%, more than FDL's 3.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	3.68%	4.04%	4.96%	4.58%	3.58%	4.59%	4.48%	3.75%	3.97%	3.18%	2.93%	3.65%
FTHI First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF	8.73%	8.70%	8.61%	8.50%	9.06%	4.37%	4.76%	4.21%	4.76%	4.00%	4.41%	4.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTHI and FDL in my portfolio?

FTHI and FDL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTHI or FDL?

FDL has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to FTHI (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTHI dropped -32.65% vs FDL's -65.93%.

Which ETF is better, FTHI or FDL?

On 10-year performance, FDL leads with 11.24% vs 8.54% for FTHI. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FTHI has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTHI or FDL?

Over the 10-year period, FDL has performed better with a 11.24% return vs 8.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTHI or FDL?

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FTHI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTHI or FDL?

FTHI has the higher dividend yield at 8.73%, compared with 3.68% for FDL.

What is the main difference between FTHI and FDL?

FTHI is categorized as Derivative Income, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FTHI and 0.45% for FDL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.