FTGS vs. MEME
FTGS (First Trust Growth Strength ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FTGS is passively managed, while MEME is actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTGS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.
Performance
FTGS vs. MEME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTGS achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 79.03% return.
FTGS
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 5.22%
- 6M
- 5.10%
- 1Y
- 12.55%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MEME
- 1D
- -5.29%
- 1M
- 25.28%
- YTD
- 79.03%
- 6M
- 68.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTGS vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTGS First Trust Growth Strength ETF | 5.22% | -3.13% |
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 79.03% | -36.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTGS and MEME is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.48 |
FTGS vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTGS
MEME
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FTGS
MEME
Healthcare
FTGS
MEME
Financial Services
FTGS
MEME
Consumer Cyclical
FTGS
MEME
-
Industrials
FTGS
MEME
Communication Services
FTGS
MEME
Energy
FTGS
MEME
Consumer Defensive
FTGS
MEME
-
Basic Materials
FTGS
MEME
Real Estate
FTGS
-
MEME
-
Utilities
FTGS
-
MEME
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTGS vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank
FTGS
MEME
FTGS vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTGS | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTGS | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.28 | +0.82 |
Drawdowns
FTGS vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTGS drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGS and MEME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTGS | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.99% | -48.78% | +28.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -5.93% | +4.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -29.90% | +27.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | — | — |
Volatility
FTGS vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTGS | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.45% | 74.19% | -60.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 74.19% | -57.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 74.19% | -57.04% |
FTGS vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTGS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTGS vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison
FTGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTGS First Trust Growth Strength ETF | 0.09% | 0.16% | 0.39% | 0.62% | 0.21% |
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTGS and MEME have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTGS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTGS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.
FTGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTGS and 0.69% for MEME.
Find the right allocation for FTGS and MEME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer