PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTGS vs. MEME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTGS vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTGS achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 79.03% return.


FTGS

1D
-0.75%
1M
3.43%
YTD
5.22%
6M
5.10%
1Y
12.55%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10Y*

MEME

1D
-5.29%
1M
25.28%
YTD
79.03%
6M
68.18%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTGS vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FTGS
First Trust Growth Strength ETF
5.22%-3.13%
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
79.03%-36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FTGS and MEME is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025

0.48

FTGS vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTGS
MEME

Technology

30.6%
58.8%

Healthcare

17.6%
5.4%

Financial Services

16.2%
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%

-

Industrials

12.3%
29.9%

Communication Services

5.7%
5.5%

Energy

4.8%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%
4.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

10.7%

Technology

FTGS
30.6%
MEME
58.8%

Healthcare

FTGS
17.6%
MEME
5.4%

Financial Services

FTGS
16.2%
MEME
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FTGS
13.6%
MEME

-

Industrials

FTGS
12.3%
MEME
29.9%

Communication Services

FTGS
5.7%
MEME
5.5%

Energy

FTGS
4.8%
MEME
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

FTGS
2.0%
MEME

-

Basic Materials

FTGS
1.9%
MEME
4.6%

Real Estate

FTGS

-

MEME

-

Utilities

FTGS

-

MEME
10.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTGS vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTGS
FTGS Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FTGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGS Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

MEME
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTGS vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTGSMEMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.51

FTGS vs. MEME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTGSMEMEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.28

+0.82

Drawdowns

FTGS vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTGS drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGS and MEME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTGSMEMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.99%

-48.78%

+28.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-5.93%

+4.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-29.90%

+27.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

Volatility

FTGS vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTGSMEMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

74.19%

-60.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.15%

74.19%

-57.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.15%

74.19%

-57.04%

FTGS vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTGS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTGS vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

FTGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
FTGS
First Trust Growth Strength ETF
0.09%0.16%0.39%0.62%0.21%
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTGS and MEME have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTGS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTGS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

FTGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTGS and 0.69% for MEME.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTGS and MEME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer