PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTGG.DE vs. XB4A.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTGG.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in First Trust Germany AlphaDEX UCITS ETF (FTGG.DE) and Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTGG.DE achieves a 4.55% return, which is significantly lower than XB4A.DE's 24.81% return. Over the past 10 years, FTGG.DE has underperformed XB4A.DE with an annualized return of 7.17%, while XB4A.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 14.71% annualized return.


FTGG.DE

1D
-0.40%
1M
-1.49%
6M
-1.27%
YTD
4.55%
1Y
14.92%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
5.23%
10Y*
7.17%

XB4A.DE

1D
-0.62%
1M
1.14%
6M
22.10%
YTD
24.81%
1Y
48.60%
3Y*
31.52%
5Y*
18.18%
10Y*
14.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTGG.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTGG.DE
First Trust Germany AlphaDEX UCITS ETF
4.55%44.59%8.23%8.38%-26.44%13.79%7.27%21.38%-23.36%26.41%
XB4A.DE
Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)
24.81%51.29%11.01%14.27%-16.45%42.39%-10.86%19.79%-17.99%32.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FTGG.DE and XB4A.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2016

0.70

The correlation between FTGG.DE and XB4A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTGG.DE vs. XB4A.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTGG.DE
FTGG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FTGG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

XB4A.DE
XB4A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XB4A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XB4A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XB4A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XB4A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XB4A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTGG.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Germany AlphaDEX UCITS ETF (FTGG.DE) and Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTGG.DEXB4A.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.46

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

4.44

-3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.31

15.07

-11.75

FTGG.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTGG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the XB4A.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTGG.DE and XB4A.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTGG.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTGG.DE drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than XB4A.DE's maximum drawdown of -53.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGG.DE and XB4A.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTGG.DEXB4A.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.97%

-53.54%

-46.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.61%

-10.88%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.18%

-16.26%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.87%

-32.50%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.97%

-53.54%

-46.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.93%

-1.85%

-4.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.58%

-9.88%

-2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.84%

3.22%

+1.62%

Volatility

FTGG.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Germany AlphaDEX UCITS ETF (FTGG.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) at 5.22%. This indicates that FTGG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XB4A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTGG.DEXB4A.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

5.22%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.05%

14.88%

+2.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.85%

17.61%

+2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.07%

19.15%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69,376.52%

20.15%

+69,356.37%

FTGG.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTGG.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XB4A.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTGG.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Dividend Comparison

FTGG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, while XB4A.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FTGG.DE
First Trust Germany AlphaDEX UCITS ETF
1.55%1.53%2.24%2.85%3.10%1.03%0.58%0.05%
XB4A.DE
Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTGG.DE and XB4A.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XB4A.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XB4A.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FTGG.DE.

FTGG.DE tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Germany NTR Index, while XB4A.DE tracks ATX Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FTGG.DE and 0.25% for XB4A.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTGG.DE and XB4A.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer