PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTCS vs. QNXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTCS vs. QNXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) and iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCS achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly lower than QNXT's 15.67% return.


FTCS

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
0.01%
6M
0.21%
1Y
2.29%
3Y*
9.49%
5Y*
5.40%
10Y*
10.16%

QNXT

1D
-0.61%
1M
9.65%
YTD
15.67%
6M
13.13%
1Y
25.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTCS vs. QNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
0.01%6.46%-2.71%
QNXT
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
15.67%14.97%-2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCS and QNXT is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024

0.55

The correlation between FTCS and QNXT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTCS vs. QNXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTCS
QNXT

Financial Services

20.4%
1.0%

Industrials

19.6%
10.6%

Healthcare

19.1%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

14.3%
5.7%

Technology

12.3%
40.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
17.0%

Communication Services

2.3%
8.8%

Energy

2.2%
2.7%

Basic Materials

2.1%

-

Real Estate

-

0.3%

Utilities

-

6.1%

Financial Services

FTCS
20.4%
QNXT
1.0%

Industrials

FTCS
19.6%
QNXT
10.6%

Healthcare

FTCS
19.1%
QNXT
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

FTCS
14.3%
QNXT
5.7%

Technology

FTCS
12.3%
QNXT
40.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FTCS
7.7%
QNXT
17.0%

Communication Services

FTCS
2.3%
QNXT
8.8%

Energy

FTCS
2.2%
QNXT
2.7%

Basic Materials

FTCS
2.1%
QNXT

-

Real Estate

FTCS

-

QNXT
0.3%

Utilities

FTCS

-

QNXT
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTCS vs. QNXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCS
FTCS Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FTCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCS Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCS Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

QNXT
QNXT Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
QNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
QNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTCS vs. QNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) and iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTCSQNXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.29

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

2.50

-2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.73

8.17

-7.44

FTCS vs. QNXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTCS Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the QNXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCS and QNXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTCSQNXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

1.70

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.90

-0.40

Drawdowns

FTCS vs. QNXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCS drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, which is greater than QNXT's maximum drawdown of -22.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCS and QNXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTCSQNXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.64%

-22.25%

-31.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.74%

-10.16%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.95%

-0.61%

-6.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.92%

-3.79%

-3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

3.11%

+0.03%

Volatility

FTCS vs. QNXT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) is 2.64%, while iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that FTCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QNXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTCSQNXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

3.52%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.99%

10.92%

-3.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.82%

15.05%

-5.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.13%

19.73%

-6.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

19.73%

-4.19%

FTCS vs. QNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCS has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than QNXT's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTCS vs. QNXT - Dividend Comparison

FTCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than QNXT's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
1.12%1.04%1.33%1.47%1.23%1.06%0.93%1.26%1.26%1.15%1.43%1.50%
QNXT
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
0.60%0.64%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTCS and QNXT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QNXT has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to FTCS (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCS dropped -53.64% vs QNXT's -22.25%.

On 1-year performance, QNXT leads with 25.34% vs 2.29% for FTCS. On fees, QNXT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FTCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QNXT has performed better with a 25.34% return vs 2.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QNXT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for FTCS.

FTCS has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.60% for QNXT.

FTCS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QNXT is Nasdaq-100. FTCS tracks The Capital Strength Index, while QNXT tracks Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for FTCS and 0.20% for QNXT.

QNXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTCS and QNXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer